Lessons from the saga of LonelyGirl15: Mainstream media + blogosphere = mediasphere on steroids
By Tom Foremski - September 13, 2006
At SVW we're lucky to break the story of the identity of LonelyGirl15 before others. We were fortunate, thanks to the work of my son, Matt Foremski, to connect the dots ahead of others--maybe by just a few hours.
There are many that worked on this story from the beginning when it was discovered that LG15 was a fake. Some were "citizen journalists"; some were mainstream media professionals. SVW straddled the two; and there is still more to be discovered about this story.
There are many who deserve credit for figuring out that LG15 was a manufactured product, especially those who tracked the IP address of emails to a Hollywood talent agency.
But this is not a story about an actress acting out a script. This is a story with a larger message: it shows how a partnership between mainstream media and blogger media can produce real results, real fast.
Both groups took the story further, building off each other's work.
This was in no way the blogosphere versus the mainstream media. It was a great example of how the two groups can work together, to uncover information that others tried to hide.
Yes, the subject matter of this story was not about anything that matters that much. But imagine this same type of cooperation on really important stories--that's what excites me.
There is always intense competition to be first with a story--but that is good. And it is complimentary competition rather than adversarial. There is no such thing as bloggers versus mainstream media.
This is the media model for the future: a mediasphere that uses the best qualities of professional media combined with relentless pursuit of information by citizen journalists. That's a potent formula that bodes well for our society, IMHO.
. . .
Please see:
Mark Glaser at MediaShift: Matt Foremski’s Sleuthing Leads to Jessica Rose
How the secret identity of LonelyGirl15 was found
The Hunt for LonelyGirl15- Life in a blogger household
SVW Exclusive: The identity of LonelyGirl15
LonelyGirl15 faked . . .
By Tom Foremski - September 13, 2006 | Permalink | Comment
| Category: Mediasphere
| SVW Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW Mobile
- NEW STORIES:
- 2009: The Year Of The Great Repression
- Letter From London . . .
- FutureWatch: The End Of The News Aggregators And The Future Of News
- Saturday Post: Stemming Deflation When Thrift Is The Answer . . .
- The State Of VC Funding In Southern California
- Shrinking Mass Media Masses At Googleplex
- The Black Swans Have Yet To Come Home To Roost . . .
- No Men Allowed: Girls In Tech Expands To New York, LA, And Beyond
- Let's Take A Lesson From The Chip Industry: Turn The Big 3 Auto Makers Into Car Foundries . . .
- Doug Engelbart In 1968 - The Computer Demo That Changed Lives!
Comments (4)
Kudos to your son. He's a chip off the old block.
Posted: September 13, 2006 9:03 AM
Tom, well done to Matt,(Did he get paid?)
Saying that, how will citizen journalists actually work with pro's to break a story? I see the power but not the methodology. Does the pro ask the citizen journalists to help out and feed back the info and get credited for doing their part?
Or, as with more biz related stories it is the non-disclosed 'source' that pro's have relied on that will prevail!
Apple & HP recent cases, spring to mind! As jobs can be on the line! (Both sides)
Tom Foremski comment: The way it works is that everybody publishes and therefore everybody that contributes gets the credit. Technorati links or Google hits will show the timeline and sources. But, yes, unamed sources will play a part in telling the story. Also, the mainstream press has easier access to key people that citizen journalists don't, and that is important in moving a story forward.
Posted: September 13, 2006 12:01 PM
Tom,
Have you ever read WIlliam Gibson's novel, Pattern Recognition? It's the same premise as LG15,of mysterious footage appearing on the internet down to a web discussion board where people discuss "the footage" and where it's from/if it's fake etc.
Life imitating art...
Posted: September 14, 2006 9:11 AM
Journalistic Up-Skirting. That’s what that is.
And what good did the reporting do?
You may argue (wrongly) that you revealed a fraud. But factually, that’s wrong. There was/is no transaction. What you did was wreck a perfectly wonderfully entertaining fiction in the name journalism.
So I guess irresponsibility is the media model of the future?
Tom Foremski comment: Amanda, my apologies for wrecking your entertainment, but there are plenty of other soaps I could point you to... The thing was wrecked from the beginning, the truth will out eventually. It's just that "eventually" has a shorter lifespan these days.
Posted: September 14, 2006 4:05 PM