The Internet train wreck part 2: This is where you can see it...
By Tom Foremski - February 21, 2005
In the earlier post I asked:
“There is no doubting that the Internet is a powerful technology, and therefore it must be a disruptive technology. But where is the disruption in the tech sector? Intel, HP, IBM, Cisco, and all the other well-established tech companies are still here, after the Internet revolution.”
I realized that I was looking for the train wreck in the wrong place. I was looking in the tech sector, but I realized that the Internet was not about a new technology, its technologies based on microprocessor, software, and network technologies were not that new. Yes, the chips used for Internet systems and so on, were more powerful and cheaper than before, but that was because of improvements to technologies that had already been invented--silicon chip technologies that led to microprocessor, memory chip, operating systems, and related technologies. There were no "new" technologies that enabled the Internet.
The Internet became the first "open source" project
What was new about the Internet was that we had a single collection of standards for communicating e-mail and other data between computers, on a highly reliable network. Plus, we had the web browser--a way to read web pages on any PC computer screen.
All these Internet technologies were held in a type of creative commons, no company owned them, they were developed with US government funds and offered openly. And they continue to be developed openly. It's a great example of the Internet as the first open source project. And it’s a government initiated open-source project (is the US government communist, Bill? ;-)
Internet as disruptive media technology
So, with a common foundation of communications technologies, the internet plus the web browser became a fantastic publishing/media platform.
And it is a disruptive technology, but it is a disruptive media technology. The web browser allows for cheap and easy publication of pages of content, and their distribution.
Here is the train wreck
The train wreck is occurring in the printed media sector (and soon—in the older “new” media sector--the online news magazines formed 5 to 10 years ago.)
Layoffs continue to be announced almost every quarter by newspaper groups. My profession has probably suffered the worst of any sector since the dotcom dotbust.
Technology and technology-jobs related advertising--a vital mainstay of newspaper and print magazine revenues for more than 20 years, continues to decline. For example, Dow Jones latest numbers showed a continued decline in tech advertising of more than 27 percent in the most recent quarter, from a year ago--down 24 percent for the full year.
Tech print advertising isn’t coming back and the continued consolidation in the tech industry, such as Symantec and Veritas, continues to take out huge chunks of advertising.
Top Internet companies are media companies
Internet 1.0 and the web, created large technology enabled media companies. Look:
Yahoo—publisher of news and a myriad of other pages of content including ads for selling items in auctions, finding a date, and other newspaper-like services.
Google—publishes pages of content that consist of machine-harvested links and sells advertising on those pages.
Ebay—publishes pages of content by becoming a platform for others to create online catalogs and trade products through a newspaper classifieds-type of marketplace.
Amazon—publishes pages of reader-generated reviews and descriptions of books/products plus it sells almost any product from many other retailers, through its online shopping platform.
AOL-Time Warner—publisher.
Media Tech disruption will accelerate
Internet 1.0 produced media technologies that continue to disrupt print media, and that disruption will accelerate in Internet 2.0 because of the new media technologies such as blogging, wikis, and related technologies/tools/applications.
Internet 2.0 media technologies provide a two-way web, a readable and write-able web, as some call it. (Or if I were Dr Dolittle, a PushMe-PullMe type of web.)
The web browser is still important. But this time around, we get to write on the other side of the glass screen.
Building communities and a better mousetrap
The new media technologies pull together a community of readers as the content seemingly magically finds its readership. Build a better mousetrap, and truly the world does beat a path to your doorstep.
If you produce content of value, readers will find it, share it, and discuss it. If you don’t, they won’t. It’s the democratization of content.
For example, the Google atom bomb entry we published a couple of weeks ago. It was interesting to see it spread. From just about 50 mentions on other blogs/websites on Friday, it grew to 1200 then to 44k then more than 120K over the weekend. We had an astounding number of visitors on a Sunday!
Internet Squared
This combination of two-way publishing technologies results in a new type of communications architecture. Maybe it should be called Internet to the power of 2. It marries an underlying very powerful, incredibly cheap hardware and software communications technology, with a two-way media publishing technology that facilitates the movement and development of ideas on an unprecedented scale--outwards from the publisher and back towards the publisher.
To the extent print newspapers and magazines see the train coming, they can’t move out of the way of the train. That’s because we are still developing the mechanisms to recover the value of publishing human created content online.
The online ad networks and sponsored text ad links are not yet good enough and suffer from several serious issues, such as click fraud and other flaws. And so much of the establishment print media cannot jump to the online model because there is no support for its costly cost base--at least not yet. And it might be too late when it comes.
Also, in Internet 2.0, the effects of the media technologies will have a disruptive effect on almost every type of company.
I’ll tell you why later...but you can probably figure it out.
dc950
By Tom Foremski - February 21, 2005 | Permalink
| Category: New Rules
| SVW Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW Mobile
- NEW STORIES:
- Intel Experiment Could Save Millions in Data Center Power Costs
- Will East Coast Flood West Coast in Search of Jobs?
- GOOG Founders Could Buy All US Newspapers and Still Have $12bn
- Microsoft in Bay Area Recruiting Blog Sites for AdCenter Ad Network
- Silicon Valley Rocks! Charity Event for Local Schools
- Fishwrap: Changing Media and PR . . . Plus a Great Pep Talk
- Top of my 2008 Watch: Berlin Based Plista . . . and Online Dopplegangers
- The "Experiential Gap" . . . and the Growing Cosmos of Twitter Applications
- FT Anger on AIG Bailout
- Shift Happens . . . A Visit With One of My Favorite PR Companies
Comments
Tom Foremski on Survey: Bosses are keeping staff in the dark on financial crisis
Thanks John. Yes, nice post. Cisco's $26bn in cash will get you through most downturns. Don't cry for me Argentina :-)
John Earnhardt on Survey: Bosses are keeping staff in the dark on financial crisis
Tom:
Head of comms at Cisco, Blair Christie, just posted a thoughtful entry on what challenging times mean for Cisco. Net net: focus on the customer, what you can control, and experience and CASH matter. Full piece here: http://blogs.cisco.com/news/comments/the_tomorrow_economy/
Matt on We've been here before - boom and bust in Silicon Valley
Good recap.
Tom Foremski on Fishwrap: Can Silicon Valley Save the World Economy? Don't hold your breath . . .
Dave: What's interesting is that some of Silicon Valley's top entrepreneurs have attempted to make health care more efficient. There are huge amounts of inefficiency in the health care system, that translates into potential huge profits. But, health care has resisted nearly all of the productivity benefits of technology. I don't know of any other industry where technology has failed so spectacularly in making an industry more productive.
DaveinHackensack on Fishwrap: Can Silicon Valley Save the World Economy? Don't hold your breath . . .
"Good luck with that Sramana, you are looking for help in the wrong place, imho. Our VCs won't do anything unless there are substantial profits to be had."
Funny how that works: smart, ambitious folks tend to focus their energies where there are profits to be had. Not speaking about Sramana specifically, but it amazes me how many folks who will trip over themselves to buy the next iPhone or other bit of Silicon Valley innovation never seem to worry if health care innovation wou
Bob on RantWatch: Extremely Poor Service from Wells Fargo
WAMU used to deposit any amount right away and make it available to me. Too bad they are now owned by Chase.
kathy on Case Study: Wells Fargo's Effective Brand Management . . . Not!
I've had the same outrageous treatment from Wells Fargo of late. I've been a customer for 38 years. They refused to deposit without a hold a large check from my dad's estate (drawn on US Bank--just down the street from Wells Fargo). They could have easily called to verify the check, but, oh no, the funds may be there this minute but you (the customer) could go on a spending spree and the check could be returned! I'll add that I have never had an overdraft or any fees on my account. As a
Luca Penati on Tripit Builds Cult Following for Online Travel Plans
I LOVE Tripit!
Tom Foremski on Advanced Micro Devices Spins Off Chip Plants as a Foundry Joint Venture
Doubtful: Historically AMD has had yield problems and Hector Ruiz did a great job in improving production. Either way, being in the fab business is challenging enough and AMD's ATI knows the fabless business model very well. Best to stick to designs than running fabs, IMHO. But Intel could put a stop to that.
I think Intel should be a bit lenient with AMD, it's good to have competition. But Intel has a take no prisoners attitude when it comes to competitors.
Luca on UPDATE: Intel Challenge to AMD Fab Spin Off
I am 99% sure it's 2. Usually IP licensing agreements are very specific about the identity of the licensee and what is allowed. I bet AMD can't do this without Intel's approval, which will come at a very steep price...
debbie rich on When the Cloud Precipitates...Potential Problems with Online Services (and Stikipad)
Debbie here. Just to clarify, the software company that I help manage, Digital Anarchy, is the entity that lost all of its historical data. Over 1.5 years of press tracking, product revision info, vendor relationships. I brought this situation to Tom's attention because it is larger than just my company's issues. Former Stikipad customers (and folks who are confused if they ARE still customers) have found my complaints about Stikipad on my completely unadvertised personal blog and commented a
doubtful on Advanced Micro Devices Spins Off Chip Plants as a Foundry Joint Venture
Where are your getting the info on AMD low Yields?
from your sponsor Intel?
you could have said bug designs, but this happened equally to Intel!
why don't you mention that with this JV,
The intel only advantage: fab financing
is removed !
(I put monopolistic position aside waiting for multi world judgements on those practices.)
you should also mention that AMD process dev cost is shared with other major IC manufacturers like IBM Toshiba, STM, Frees
Shannon Whitley on When the Cloud Precipitates...Potential Problems with Online Services (and Stikipad)
Great topic, Tom.
Cloud Computing brings many benefits, but there will be additional risks as well. As more companies build their businesses in the cloud and utilize services (such as storage) from the likes of Amazon, Google, or Microsoft, an outage with any one company could bring down several hundred others. We should pushback and consider these risks.
As you mentioned, this pushback is healthy. We are moving forward with the technical details, but we also need to focus
mavennyc821 on The Largest Risk in Silicon Valley is Taking No Risk - Why the Economic Downturn Will Spawn Hundreds of Startups
Great post Tom, adn agree. Here's similar sentiment today on CNET:http://news.cnet.com/8301-13953_3-10060141-80.html?tag=inside
Kevin Cimring on Steve Ballmer Warns Financial Crisis Will Impact Tech Sector
Hi Tom,
It's become widely recognised and reported now that the financial crisis is and will continue to impact the tech sector. In order to survive, new start-ups will need to define revenue models upfront and will no longer be able to rely on the old "web 2.0" approach of first launching and only then worrying about revenue strategies at a later stage. For those types of companies, VC funding will be scarce.
Kevin Cimring on The "Experiential Gap" . . . and the Growing Cosmos of Twitter Applications
Hi Tom,
I enjoyed your "Experiential" piece on Twitter, as this has been my exact experience. Initially I couldn't see what all the hype was about, but I succumbed to the wave of growing publicity and gave Twitter a try. Even then, I was a little circumspect but several weeks later and I am benefitting from Twitter immensely, in various ways. I have tried to explain Twitter to my colleagues, but they still look at me as if I'm crazy - like you say, you have to be "in it" to understand
Sabrina Horn on Thought Leader Interview: - Sabrina Horn Says "Sell Like Hell!"
Thanks Tom, it was a rare opportunity to have the time to talk and ponder so many important topics. We look forward to hosting you at our place, for an under the hood look at PR at Horn Group.
Sabrina
Tom Foremski on Silicon Valley Heads for Germany as Governor Schwarzenegger Pushes for Cebit Trade Show Alliance
Thanks Florian, I did look up Rampenfest, it's pretty funny!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2uZZzHfgOk
Florian on Silicon Valley Heads for Germany as Governor Schwarzenegger Pushes for Cebit Trade Show Alliance
Thanks Tom for this article.
I watched the video and laughed about the German accents. They reminded me of a video called rampenfest (google it :))
Cheers and greetings from Germany,
Florian
Bravia on Worth Watching: Silicon Valley Turns Out for Steve Ballmer at Churchill Club
Thanks for that video. It was great.