The Mysterious Apple A4 Chip - Where's MSFT's and GOOG's Chip?

By Tom Foremski - January 29, 2010

The most unique and mysterious feature of the Apple iPad, is the A4, an Apple chip developed by the 150 plus strong engineering team it acquired when it bought PA Semi for $278m nearly two years ago.

The engineering team is top notch. CNET wrote:

While at Digital Equipment Corp., [CEO Dan] Dobberpuhl oversaw the development of the Alpha chip for servers and the StrongARM processor for handhelds...

Jim Keller, P.A. Semi's vice president of engineering, and Pete Bannon, vice president of architecture, worked on the Alpha as well. Keller then went to AMD and helped define the architecture for what became the Opteron...

EETimes says that Mr Dobberpuhl also led MIPS teams. [MIPS is another low-power high performance processor.] And it also has AMD Opteron chip designers too.

When Apple acquired PA Semi, it had developed a multi-core POWER architecture chip. POWER is an IBM processor architecture derived from a partnership with Motorola. It's what Apple used before jumping to Intel (and from Motorola 68000 microprocessor before that).

With PA Semi, Apple managed to acquire a hugely talented engineering team with bags of experience with every major microprocessor design.

Two years later, Apple has most probably invested about a $100 million a year in the PA Semi team. It has spent more than $500 million to develop the A4 chip.

That's a huge investment in a chip.

Apple is essentially saying that there is nothing like it on the market. That it could not have made the A4 chip using current designs. That's a big statement.

What's inside the A4?

We don't know for sure. We know it is an ARM based processor, running at 1 GHz. ARM gives it compatibility with iPhone apps, which are ARM based. But what else is in the chip?

It has graphics and video decoders, so it can display high quality graphics and HD video, quickly and easily, and at low power. But you can get similar capabilities from the large library of designs available off-the-shelf for ARM processors.

Why would Apple need 150 top chip engineers if that was all it wanted?

An unhackable system...

We don't yet know what else is in the A4 chip. My guess is that there is a bunch of hardcore digital rights management (DRM) hardware on the chip. It's essentially a large security dongle that happens to have its own processing and video/graphics capabilities.

This is important. All publishers love strong DRM and with the A4, Apple can offer the strongest DRM on the planet. That's what you need if you want to get music, movies, books, etc onto your platform. You have to convince publishers that digital versions of their products can't be pirated, they can't be hacked.

Apple has made what it considers to be an unhackable system.

That also means you can't clone it. You won't be able to port the iPad/iPhone OS to another system, as you can with the Mac OS, and run applications and content.

What's next from the PA Semi team? It has to be a multicore A44, so that you can run several DRM enabled pieces of content simultaneously, such as listening to music while you read on the iPad -- which you cannot do with the first version of iPad.

Then an A1, a version for the iPhone/iPod.

Apple Inside...

Apple is now a chipmaker. But the chips will only be used in its products, at least initially. Apple has spent more than half-a-billion dollars to develop what it believes will give it a strong competitive advantage, and that it could not buy from current chip vendors.

However, I can see Apple allowing the A4 to be used in PCs and other devices made by others. Because the A4 is designed to work with Apple approved content that comes through its iTunes, iBooks, and AppStore - its online stores. Why not let HP systems, for example, access Apple store media? Apple gets its revenue share either way. Not much profit for HP, but at least its customers are happy they can access rich, high quality digital media.

In the near future, there might be a little bit of Apple inside lots of computers and devices from many different manufacturers. Apple might even offer it for free, subsidized by media sales. You'll find 'Apple Inside' alongside 'Intel Inside.'

Oracle recently completed its acquisition of Sun Microsystems, it now has the SPARC microprocessor; IBM has its POWER microprocessor; Apple has the A4.

The question now is: Does Microsoft need to have its own chip? What about Google? They both want to sell media. Youtube, for example, has started renting movies.

How will they convince publishers that their DRM systems are good enough? That they have unhackable DRM?

From e-media to i-media...

If I'm right about reading the tea leaves, Steve Jobs has a killer strategy to dominate the sale of all media. Excellent job Mr Jobs.



« Apple Snubbed Intel Atom For Its Own ARM-based A4 Processor | Main | Wow. GOOG Tells Jeff Jarvis It Will Disclose AdSense Payouts »


                   

Posted to A Top Story | AppleWatch

January 29, 2010 | Permalink | Comment | Subscribe to SVW

Comments (10)

mg:

Tom,

I'm continually amazed by your insight.

No joke, no smoke.

The security dongle with add on processor is a really penetrating perspective.

mg


Thanks MG. I'm just trying to read the tea leaves :)


steve:

Your post overall was great but you seriously undermine your credibility with saying they need a multicore chip to do multitasking - what?

is this a joke or a word play on "multi"?

you can multitask iPhones right now absolutely fine (jailbroken). it's absolutely NOT a hardware performance issue.


Great insight, Tommy. Either they spent $500 million for nothing or they had bigger plans in mind. We shall see.


Steve, it's not about multitasking, it's all about the business model. Sorry to confuse you.


Kevin Krewell:

As the guy quoted in the CNet article as saying ""This is an all-star group of designers," I do have to say, it is a very talented team. Turning the SoC design in ~18 months required tight execution and maybe, some shortcuts - like no full 1080p HD support.

I expect there's an A4 II in the works right now. That said, my company's Tegra 2 handles everything the A4 can do, plus full 1080HD today.

The advantage for Apple in building a custom chip is that it can exactly customized to Apple's requirements and could incorporate those DRM blocks you conjecture about. Jobs was not happy with the relationship with IBM at the end of the PowerPC era and maybe Intel has been less than helpful considering that Apple doesn't care for Intel's graphics lack of OpenCL capability.


Thanks Kevin. The Tegra2 sounds like very capable chip.


I don't think there'd be DRM in this first edition of the chip, but I could be wrong. However, your thinking is another puzzle piece that makes this ultimately possible:

Why The iTunes/App Store Model Will Ultimately Fail
http://snurl.com/u8vtb



Archangel:

Any DRM Apple puts in the iPad (whether in silicon or not) won't be "unbreakable" as you suggest. If that's what cost half a billion, it's a questionable decision.

Other equally (or more) capable chips - snapdragon, TegraII, etc. - Jobs will have to do a 180 with his insanely closed system propensity and try to license the A4 to others or shareholders may eventually wonder where's the beef?


Archangel, yes I agree that there is a licensing opportunity for the A4, an "Apple Inside" inside other e-readers that can read Apple store media. iSuppli estimates it costs $17 to make. Putting the DRM into hardware will make it much tougher to hack...


Post a comment