MediaWatch Analysis: Murdoch Will Negotiate Payment For Access To Basket Of Content With GOOG et al
By Tom Foremski - November 15, 2009
Rupert Murdoch and his senior execs at News Corp, and Wall Street Journal have been getting a lot of publicity this year for their complaints against Google and news aggregators.
Google has borne much of the brunt of the complaints even though Yahoo News is three times larger (source: Danny Sullivan at SearchEngineLand).
Foremski's Take:
But why have Mr Murdoch and others at News Corp. spent so much time criticizing Google when there is a simple solution: post a robot.txt file that tells Google and others not to search and index their content?
Because criticizing Google results in a lot more publicity. Because Mr Murdoch has another goal: he is most probably laying the groundwork to negotiate a deal with Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, and others, where they will pay to index News Corp content and also content from other publishers allied with News Corp.
Take a look at these points:
- By collecting a package of other publishers, Mr Murdoch can avoid the problem caused by what I call "first mover disadvantage" in that the first publishers with paywalls, risk losing audience to rivals that wait to build their paywalls. That's a much larger business risk than the traffic lost from blocking Google. That's a risk all news publishers face not just News Corp. Better to be in a collective.
- Mr Murdoch is emerging as a champion for other news publishers in his criticism of Google. That's an excellent opportunity to become the rallying point for the newspaper industry as a whole and to recruit publishers into a common basket of content.
- Mr Murdoch and his top executives are masters at using the media to manipulate others to get what they want -- in this case Google is the target.
- Why would competitors join with Mr Murdoch? A better question is why wouldn't they? They would all still compete on writing the news first, that wouldn't change in either scenario. The advantage would be better revenues from subscriptions using a collective approach. Mr Murdoch and his allies could offer packages consisting of local, regional, national and even foreign publications for one monthly fee. No need for micropayments by readers -- the payments could be divided up within the group transparently, the readers pay one fee.
- Would readers pay for content? They already do. Revenue from subscribers has already overtaken revenue from advertising at many publications. In its most recent financial quarter the New York Times said revenues from readers overtook advertising revenues for the first time -- a watershed moment. That's a trend that still has a ways to go and will be helped by new ways to collect subscriptions for online content.
- Would GOOG et al, pay for access to index content? Yes, GOOG already pays for content from the AP and for TV shows to show on YouTube.
- Google would pay because search engines need novelty. They need to index new content. Otherwise why do people use a search engine? To find what they already know is there, or to look for new content? It's mostly the latter.
- If users know that a search engine is blocked from new content then that is a very negative psychological strike against it -- what else doesn't it have? Google, and others need to maintain an impression that they "index all the world's content." Index is their prime goal, rather than to serve up free content.
Josh Cohen at Google News made this very point "there is still a lot of those discussions that take place where people will say ... 'I have to make this content free or Google won't index it,' and that's not the case."
- Google is open to working with publishers in a variety of ways. Danny Sullivan at SearchEngineLand interviewed Josh Cohen at Google News. He said that Google already has a large number of different programs to offer publishers and will work on custom programs too.
Here are a couple more quotes from Google's Josh Cohen:
"We want to be in a situation where the best content wins, not the best SEOed site."
"You can allow us to crawl content and show a preview to the user and label it as a subscription."
Mr Murdoch and his allies will be able to have their cake and eat it in the sense that they can have Google index their content, and also have a paywall.
Plus, they have many business levers to pull in that they can continue to make some content free; to place less content behind a paywall; and to optimize their landing pages for Google and other traffic to make for better ad conversions (as Jonathan Mendez points out in SVW comments).
And potentially get a payment from Google and other search engines in addition to everything else.
This will be one of the ways the media industry halts the decline in its fortunes. Overall, the media industry will need to adopt what I call a "Heinz 57" business model, with multiple revenue streams, there won't be just one or two magic bullets.
The challenge for publishers will be in managing multiple sources of revenue. But that's an opportunity for startups to offer the admin tools, and help aggregate the revenues streams for large publishers.
- - -
Please see:
Analysis On Murdoch And Switching Off GOOG: The Dirty Little Secret About Search Engine Traffic...
WSJ Chief: There Are Two Types: Creators And Aggregators - Creators Carry The Burden Of Costs
Google Is Really Bad At Monetizing Content Yet CEO Schmidt Lectures Newspapers
« WeekendWatcher: The Sheer Number Of Things Will Devalue Them | Main | MediaWatch Analysis Part II: Google Has More To Lose Than Murdoch »
Posted to MediaWatch
November 15, 2009 | Permalink | Comment | Subscribe to SVW
- Top Stories:
- Rob Glaser: Pioneer Of Badware Leaves Real Networks
- New Info: Chinese Hackers Targeted GOOG's Internal Spy System
- Analysis: GOOG China Pull Out Might Be An Extension Of Its 'Borderless' Korean Policy
- Google Finds Its Backbone - Won't Censor China Search, May Close China Operations
- EAST MEETS WEST - 5 Observations on Silicon Valley from an MIT Sloan Perspective
- Additional Thoughts On The Killer Pitch . . .
- The Killer Pitch? - When PR Agencies Can Do This - Look Out . . .
- CES Diary: Media Woes... When Foresight Is No Better Than Hindsight
- Analysis: Here's What's Next After Nexus - GOOG's Cunning Mobile Strategy...
- Arrington Defends Zynga Scam Story From Top New York VC
- Gawker Media Focuses On Uniques As Key Metric
- Analysis: GOOG Needs To Have Its Own Telco Service More Than It Needs A Phone...
Comments (3)
I cannot say what Mr Murdoch is planning to do, but I agree that he has a lot stronger hand now than the search engines ever will. Unless, of course, they start creating their own and/or buy 3rd party content, which is unlikely -- that would be against their current business model.
More importantly, Murdoch has one more ace in his deck -- he can buy Yahoo (as he has already tried, I think), and turn it into a premium content SE!
What Google would be left with to index then, the free and user-generated content that Eric Schmidt calls "a cesspool"?
Posted: November 16, 2009 8:19 AM
Greg, well said. Google has painted itself into a corner and has far fewer options than Murdoch. And it will never get into content creation because that's not its business. Yahoo has tried several times to get into content creation and failed. Silicon Valley companies are server and software based because that's a scalable business. People based companies such as the New York Times have no interest to a Google...
Posted: November 16, 2009 1:00 PM
Yeah. And, too bad for everyone, because there is enough room to increase the pie, we call www, and thus earn more money, instead of trying to carve out as big a piece of it as possible, often at the expense of others.
The latter strategy also brings money, but it is so shortsighted.
Posted: November 16, 2009 1:24 PM