Pedal To The Metal: Is It Time For A New Sequoia Presentation?
By Tom Foremski - September 17, 2009
| |
- Subscribe to SVW by email - You should follow me on Twitter here - Send me a friend request on Facebook and LinkedIn. |
By Tom Foremski - September 17, 2009
Rarely has a Powerpoint presentation deck had as much destructive power as the one prepared by Eric Upin, partner at Sequoia Capital.
"R.I.P. Good Times" was presented about a year ago in a mandatory meeting of all the CEOs backed by Sequoia. Mike Moritz and Doug Leone laid down the line: slash jobs and expenses now - the fallout from the financial crisis could last for years. [GigaOm:Sequoia Rings the Alarm Bell: Silicon Valley Is in Trouble]
The presentation was leaked and circulated wildly with nearly half-a-million views.
Silicon Valley VCs might like to think of themselves as svelte wolf packs sniffing out the best investment opportunities, but they more often act like herd animals all running in the same direction -- especially when spooked.
The RIP presentation had a huge multiplier effect. Thousands of startups cut jobs and slashed spending. Outside services, especially PR firms, were hurt badly as companies cancelled or cut their retainers to the bone.
Now we are beginning to see some green shoots of a recovery. There has been some very welcome M&A activity and at very generous valuations.
Recent acquisitions in the hi-tech field include the purchase of Mint.com by Intuit for $170m (£102m), Adobe buying Omniture for $1.8bn (£1.08bn), the sale of Skype to a private equity syndicate for $2bn (£1.2bn) and the purchase of SpringSource by VMware for $420m (£254m).
BBC NEWS | Technology | Silicon Valley 'seeing revival'
All we need now is the IPO market to spark up and Silicon Valley will roar back to life.
But why wait? Surely it is better to have all your ducks in a row now. This is a great time to invest in people and services to make sure your startups are well positioned and well known.
Surely now is the time for another Sequoia presentation: "Pedal to the Metal." You can bet they won't be leaking that one.
- - -
Please see:
RIP: Sequoia Capital's hedge fund? | VentureBeat
Sequoia Capital partner Eric Upin has left the storied Silicon Valley venture capital firm to work at investment management firm Makena Capital Management, according to Forbes.
You're Fired, Er, No You're Not - Layoffs - Gawker
Sequoia Capital, the backer of Apple, Yahoo, and Google, ordered its startups to slash their payrolls this fall. We hear one CEO fired people so enthusiastically he had to retract some of his pink slips.
« Some Observations On Trends In Media And PR . . . | Main | Guest Post: Making Forgetfulness A Distant Memory »
Posted to A Top Story | VCWatch
September 17, 2009 | Permalink | Comment | Subscribe to SVW
- New! SVW Webcast Channel - Interviews With Top Executives - Free Registration.
Tom Foremski #28 on San Francisco - Silicon Valley Top 50 Most InfluentialGabe: You should get a press pass and if you don't, you should ban SXSW stories from Techmeme. (SXSW gets very noisy, you'd be doing us all a big favor :)
I like the look of Yada, seems like a very useful thing.
Tom, two points:
1. You are a strange man.
2. Press passes cost $299? You sure? In any case I wasn't offered one. Please reread my tome on this matter: http://twitter.com/gaberivera/status/10238453895
Money is neither noble or ignoble. It is value-neutral.
You seem convinced that this project will be exclusively funded by the ultra-rich; obviously BANP's hope is that the community will step up and slowly allow the organization to be weaned off Hellman's seed money. I wish them luck -- but to be honest, the track record for local endeavors of this type isn't great so far. Still, I res
Danny: I agree... But press passes aren't free this year. They cost $299. Gabe can afford $299.
This sums it up perfectly:
'Advertising doesn't sell stuff' by Dave Trott
http://digg.com/u1Ps9L
Eric: What's so noble about a non-profit status in regards to news organizations? What's so noble about relying on handouts from billionaires to produce local news?
If we can develop profitable news business models then we will have competition, and that is good for news, good for everyone.
San Francisco used to have more than a dozen daily newspapers. Each one trying to compe
While I'm no fan of the way the BANP has acquitted itself thus far, your comment that "There's plenty of 'non-profit' media businesses around, the largest local one is the San Francisco Chronicle." is glib to the point of meaninglessness.
As I'm sure you're aware, an organization's not-for-profit status is far more germane to its mission than to its ability to generate revenue. The Chro
Free the Gabe 1! The Techmeme 1?
Seriously, if there are any TV editors getting passes, then Gabe should. Press isn't just defined by writing stories.
Actually, there is good news for publishers ... And it involves creating engagement experiences with the content rather than trying to sell content directly. (see some examples in this AdAge article: http://micurl.com/xijmu)
The key is create an experience that broadens the one:many experience of today's newspaper expereince with a socially connec
It is "underground" now because the consultants are pretending Social Media is a big "secret" worth $22K/ day (see my post on this - Is Chris Brogan Worth $22K?http://micurl.com/wpFeo)
As a client trying to buy social media services -- it is too hard today. There many little "bits" running around without a mature understanding of how to create value through a programmatic marketing ap
I think many PR/communications professionals are still getting their heads around the new media world order. What's surprising here is this happened at SXSW.
Good stuff Tom. Did you see this interview with did with Megan McCarthy of Techmeme btw? http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/techmemes_new_editor.php
Judy, yes, it is a new mdoel but is it already broken? One of my contacts told me that there is a lot of social media marketing going on but that it is underground. I thugh that the point is for it to be seen, rather than be 'underground.'
Ted: Yes, I agree, some big roll ups on the way. Every week I'm introduced to yet another successful ad network I've never heard of, with tons of people and VC money. They have the upper hand right now, but ad networks are not a sustainable business long term, imho.
I agree re the sophisticated news consumer. Note that this consumer is probably more likely to respond to the news in some way as well.
Tom,
My biggest beef with the Poynter Online piece is the implication that auctions only work well for high priced goods which strikes as basically ridiculous.
In addition, I concur that the notion of creating artificial scarcity will not work either.
Fact of the matter is that there are too many *bad* advertising units out there that will get sold at rock-bottom prices
Actually Tom I disagree. Social media does work at promoting products. What you miss is a mature marketing approach to social media.
I personally could not find a social media agency - I did find lots of "social media consultants".
And social media is not just part of something else -- it is new corporate branding model. What is missing is marketing maturity - but it's coming...
I 100% agree. As you say Tom, there's just not enough liquidity in the marketplace. The only way such a market place would work is if every advertiser from P&G to the corner deli and every publisher from NYTimes to corner blog are all on the same network and all watching prices like an experienced market floor trader. The market places I hear envisioned aren't anywhere close to that and I expec
Guy: I like that Drucker quote.
I had a very similar experience with Apple. My MacBook just wouldn't work after about 2 1/2 years of life, the logic board was replaced three times and the issue still wasn't fixed (not starting, turning off randomly, etc.) I had to FIGHT with Apple Service via phone to get a new computer issued, as the issues with the old one were obviously not fixable. The store was worthless, they couldn't e
Marshall: Yes, you are right, bad marketing can ruin good products. Sometimes even good marketing and good products is no guarantee of success. I remember the excellent word of mouth marketing around Tivo, a great product, yet growth was still very slow.
That sounds like a variation on the old "build it and they will come" idea that continues to plague technology companies.
The problem is that can have the coolest, most useful, most technologically superior new way to do 'X', but if the idea doesn't develop sufficient awareness within your target market, you're a flop.
Put simply - the world won't buy your better mousetrap un
Guy: Well said.
You just echoed the eternal mousetrap fallacy, which has killed more Silicon Valley start-ups than Oracle.
Drucker himself said that business has only two functions -- marketing and innovation (everything else is admin work).
Marketing is essential to getting great products into buyers hands. That being said, my consultancy has had to repair a lot of other people's terrible mar
Marketing is important and it is a whole lot easier if you have a great product or service in the first place. It sucks when you are trying to sell something which isn't very good.
Might be a bit of a quick draw statement. There are lists of pretty awesome, relevant and accessible products that have failed due to consumer 'non-awareness.' Marketing (and that includes PR) can definitely contribute to a product's viability - if only by getting the word out and capturing your attention.
I have an amazing product. My competitor no so much. They do spend a great deal more than me in marketing. It makes it difficult sometime. Have lost many sales because no one ever heard of us.
People have to know about your product. People have to know how great it is.
Wow. That was quick! Not the thing I expected but I totally agree with you.
Cedric, I agree that such a situation would be ridiculous. But the Italian court case is just one sign that Google is being looked at as a media company. And that means it will increasingly come under the same scrutiny, and be expected to shoulder some of the same responsibilities that media companies do today. Media companies can be very profitable businesses, they manage to exist despite all
Silicon Valley Watcher--reporting on the business and culture of disruption. © Tom Foremski 2004 - 2009 Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-noDerivs 2.5.
Comments (1)
A new presentation, yes.
But from Sequoia and Silicon Valley? I'd say no.
The next phase is not about a single firm or place.
Posted: September 17, 2009 1:16 PM