Silicon Valley Watcher - Former FT journalist Tom Foremski reporting from the intersection of technology and media

Cash Rich Tech Companies Cutting Jobs

Posted by Tom Foremski - January 22, 2009

Tough times call for tough measures and we can see that in the increasing numbers of layoffs among large tech companies.

It must be particularly tough on staff being cut from companies with large amounts of cash in the bank. They worked hard to help their companies create large cash reserves during the good times but they aren't able to benefit from those nest eggs when times turn bad. Too bad.

Here is a look at the cash (and debt) of some top tech companies:

Microsoft (MSFT) $19.71 billion ($1.98 billion debt)

Microsoft Layoffs - 5000 Jobs To Be Eliminated

Google (GOOG) $14.41 billion (no debt)

Google Layoffs: 6000 Cut - Details Kept Off Web

Intel (INTC) $11.84 billion ($1.99 billion debt)

Intel restructuring operations in Asia and US, up to 6,000 jobs affected

Cisco Systems (CSCO) $26.7 billion ($6.87 billion debt)

Cisco Schedules Conference Call for Q2 Fiscal Year 2009 Financial Results - Yahoo! Finance

Adobe (ADBE) $2.02 billion ($350 million debt)

600 job cuts at Adobe > News > Flash Magazine

Yahoo! (YHOO) $3.2 billion ($63 million debt)

Latest rumor has Yahoo firing 3,000 workers - BloggingStocks

eBay (EBAY) $3.64 billion (no debt)

EBay cuts 1000 - MarketWatch

Apple (AAPL) $24.49 billion (no debt)

Here is an excerpt from an editorial by John Dalziel at Flash Magazine on Adobe's recent 600 job cuts:

. . . It is interesting to see a company that makes almost a billion quarterly, thinking that a possible loss in revenue of 2-4% is a great reason to fire more than 8% of their staff?

. . . Let's hope that the Adobe executives remember that they're primarily in the knowledge business. It's really their employees that makes a difference, not layoffs that are staged to impress shareholders. After all - a company that earns $130.000 per employee per quarter (!) shouldn't really be considered so unprofitable it has to fire people? In our books, that's a decent profit so the layoffs seems more like a play for the shareholders than actually making a difference. Eventually this will hurt Adobe's innovation as employees feel it's an unsafe place to work.

600 job cuts at Adobe > News > Flash Magazine

The same argument could be easily applied to almost any large tech company.

Sarah Lacy over at Business Week writes:

Big companies could lose valuable employees to rival startups if they abandon their traditional lure: job security

In December, IAC Interactive (IACI) CEO Barry Diller said the unthinkable—at least for a corporate executive amid a recession. "The idea of a company that's earning money…to have cutbacks just so they can earn another $12 million or $20 million or $40 million in a year when no one's counting is really a horrible act when you think about it on every level," Diller told the crowd at the Reuters Media Summit. In other words, if you're making money, you shouldn't be laying off huge numbers of employees to please an investor base that's unlikely to be appeased in any case.

Corporate America, Swing Your Ax Wisely - BusinessWeek

Story link | Subscribe free | Categories: A Top Story, Silicon Valley




ForemskiInnovator.jpg

The Holmes Report names Tom Foremski one of the top 25 Innovators of 2013.




-->