Why Silicon Valley is Media Valley: And Why Japan Is Interested...
By Tom Foremski - February 21, 2008
For about three years now I've been talking about how Silicon Valley is transforming into "Media Valley" because our brightest, and our fastest growing companies are, according to my metrics, media companies.
Companies such as Google, Yahoo, eBay, Facebook, Digg are all media companies. They publish pages of content with advertising around it.
These are not technology companies but rather technology-enabled media companies. And this is a key distinction.
I've been writing about this change for about three years, and how the center of the media industry is shifting from New York city to Silicon Valley.
Our media industry is thriving and expanding, their (NYC) media industry is shrinking (as one example New York Times last week announced 100 newsroom job cuts).
Initially, only a couple of people picked up on my Media Valley concept, a couple of journalism professors at NYU. But gradually, over the past couple of years, more and more people have grown to understand this perspective.
This has been especially evident within the Japanese media community. Last year, I was featured in Nikkei business magazine, Japan's largest business magazine. And today (Wednesday), a four-person TV crew flew in from one of Japan's largest TV channels and interviewed me for three hours on this topic.
[I took some video that I will post very shortly, of them interviewing me, about the media industry. I love talking to the media about the media industry, but it always feels a little (sometimes a lot) Alice-in-Wonderland-ish, a hall of mirrors effect.]
In my world, I see everything as a media technology, and as a media strategy. I've said this before many times: Every company is now a media company to a greater degree than ever before. Even if a company makes steel, or napkins. Every company publishes to its customers, staff, partners, neighbors, to itself. It had better master the two-way media technologies that we now have or it will not survive.
Three years ago, when I would write about this, few people understood. Now, this is becoming better understood. But only slightly, which means there is still a lot of work to be done to help organizations understand this fundamental sea change.
And we, in Silicon (Media) Valley, are best positioned to help educate others about what is going on. It is happening not because we say it is but because it just is.
By Tom Foremski - February 21, 2008 | Permalink | Comment
| Category: Media Watch
| SVW Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW Mobile
- NEW STORIES:
- Top Blogger Pay Controversy - Pat Phelan
- FishWrap: The First Rule of PR . . . Kevin Maney's Briefs . . . Fortune's Brainstorm
- Friday News Watch: Intel Turns 40 . . .
- GOOG Continues to Out Compete its Partner Sites
- Lunch with Applied Materials: Looking to the Sun for New Business
- Sam Whitmore at Night: Media Struggling with Media Formats . . . and Leaving the Blogging Life
- Thursday Afternoon News Watch: AMD CEO Resigns, GOOG Dissapoints, MSFT's Big Expenses, IBM Beats Forecasts
- Thursday News Watch: Most Online Communities Fail . . .
- Anderson Defends Investing in the Long Tail
- Tuesday News Watch: YHOO, MSFT and Icahn Continue Spatting . . . [Don't they have any businesses to run?]
Comments (5)
Tom, this is a great concept. Do you plan on developing it beyond your reporting, maybe into a book or something?
Posted: February 21, 2008 2:40 AM
You have a great post. I like the idea that Silicon Valley -> Media Valley.
I also share your idea that everything as a media technology, although the level of technology involved is different.
Thanks for your post.
Posted: February 21, 2008 6:48 AM
Peter, I am working on a book idea but not specifically about this topic. It's about the "New Rules Enterprise."
Posted: February 21, 2008 9:31 AM
This idea of companies/vendors/individuals as publishers is one that's very evident in my realm as well, as a PR professional. In a recent chat with Sam Whitmore, this shift was a key point of his as well.
The frustrating part is that many companies are more frightened about this idea than they are excited about the power --and direct channel --it provides for them to engage in conversations with their customers. I suppose it's our job to help them understand how to take advantage of the shift.
Posted: February 21, 2008 11:26 AM
Erin: Exactly. This is why they pay you the big bucks... :-)
Posted: February 22, 2008 3:34 AM