Is GOOG Shafting Its AdSense Partners?
By Tom Foremski - October 24, 2007
The most interesting thing about Google's recent quarterly financial report is why there has been virtually no coverage of a fascinating fact in its third quarter numbers.
I wrote about it last Thursday when the report was announced, and got a scoop. Four days later on Monday, Rick Aristotle Munarriz over at "The Motely Fool" noticed it too: Don't get cocky, Google
But apart from myself and Mr Munarriz, I don't see any of the many-hundred-strong Google press corp investigating a fascinating and potential troubling aspect of its business: Did GOOG beat analyst estimates by fixing the payout to its AdSense partners?
The third quarter numbers clearly show that It kept an extra $24m this quarter compared with three months ago.
I wondered if this was an example of "cookie jar" accounting (which isn't illegal . . . ), in which companies can draw on various financial resources to help them meet Wall Street analyst numbers.
I'm still waiting for an answer.
Let me explain: The key number I look for is Google's Traffic Acquisition Costs (TAC), which is a very large number: $1.2bn in the most recent quarter. Nearly all of that goes to its AdSense partner publishers.
But compared with the prior 3 months, Google reduced the rev share with publishing partners to the tune of about $24m.
In the second quarter Google paid out 78.62% of AdSense revenues to publishing partners or $1.063 billion.
In the third quarter Google paid out 76.70% of AdSense revenues to publishing partners or $1.116 billion.
The difference is about $24m which helped Google beat its earnings estimates. Did GOOG change the ratio of payouts to AdSense publishers to help boost its earnings?
From: ZDNet: IMHO
I looked at the transcript of the earnings conference with Wall Street analysts for some clarity. There was only one analyst that asked about the change in the TAC number and Google's top execs skirted the answer. Take a look:
[Posted from: "Seeking Alpha."]
Benjamin Schachter - UBS
If I'm reading the TAC rates right, it looks like the partner TAC went down pretty meaningfully, and then the TAC associated with Google.com went up as a percentage of revenue. I'm wondering if you could comment on those trends. . .
. . . Eric E. Schmidt
Why don't we talk about TAC rates? George, do you want to start that?
George Reyes
So our AdSense TAC went down slightly, but on the other hand, Google.com TAC went up, and primarily driven by the partner mix.
Eric E. Schmidt
Our next question.
From: Google Q3 2007 Earnings Call Transcript
So, are Google AdSense partners going to be squeezed in the future for the benefit of Google meeting Wall Street numbers? Google needs to explain what is going on otherwise the consequences could be unpleasant for its shareholders.
Achilles' heel?
If GOOG can, and has squeezed AdSense partners, is this a good thing for GOOG investors? AdSense brings in 34% of total revenues, and most AdSense partners could switch advertising networks in three clicks or less . . . [MSFT is waiting, willing, and able.]
Technorati Tags: adsense
« MSFT Pumps Vista Ahead of AAPL's Leopard Launch | Main | Newswatch 10.24.07: GOOG, MSFT fight for Facebook »
October 24, 2007 | Permalink | Comment | Category: A Top Story | Subscribe to SVW
- Top Stories:
- Technology In The Service Of Humanity
- The Death Of The Search Algorithm? Techmeme Has Six Editors
- TEDxSF - Little TED Just Like The Big TED
- SNCR Research: Social Media IS Influencing Business Decisions
- What's Next? Beyond Real-Time...
- PearlTrees: A Novel Approach To Human Mapping Of The Internet
- MediaWatch Analysis Part II: Google Has More To Lose Than Murdoch
- MediaWatch Analysis: Murdoch Will Negotiate Payment For Access To Basket Of Content With GOOG et al
- WeekendWatcher: The Sheer Number Of Things Will Devalue Them
- ChipWatch - Where Will The Next Generation Of Engineers Come From?
- Public Healthcare Could Cut Startup Costs And Help Spur Innovation
- Is GOOG's $750m AdMob Buy Strategic Or Dumb? An alternate view...
Comments (6)
Regardless of how they got it - Goog added $10+/- Billion to their market cap.
Posted: October 24, 2007 8:21 AM
Larger sites get to keep a higher percentage of revenue (say, 80%), while smaller sites will get to keep less. So, the "partner mix" may mean that big adsense sites get less traffic, or that they sign-up up more smaller sites, etc.
Posted: October 24, 2007 3:36 PM
I had a long talk with a friend today about this topic - as a former auditor, it's interesting how few people pick up on this. Google needs to increase earnings, just ratchet back adsense payouts. Since they tell us nothing, we accept whatever they give us so if they hold back more, we have no idea.
And it's true that their top partners make up the majority of the payments.
Posted: October 24, 2007 5:43 PM
Leveraging $24m into $10bn? Not bad...
Yes, larger sites get higher percentage and so it could suggest that larger sites doing less traffic. But there is nothing to show that traffic plunged at large media companies during the quarter.
Posted: October 24, 2007 6:09 PM
Not only can Google yank money back from Adsense partners, they can change the fees they charge adverisers at will and equally invisibly. A number of policy changes recently exacerbate the problem, as I wrote about here
http://www.blogs.commerce360.com/2007/10/google%e2%80%99s-invisible-hand-in-your-pocket/
Posted: October 24, 2007 6:55 PM
Goog won't be running out of knobs to turn anytime soon
either...
Posted: October 25, 2007 7:41 AM