Do journalists want a social media news release?
By Tom Foremski - December 9, 2006
[This is from my comments section - from Kevin Murphy US Editor at Computerwire on the subject of the Social Media Press Release which I described in a late night post called Die! Press release! Die! Die! Die!
Kevin Murphy asks:
Two innocent questions:
1) Tom -- when was the last time you wrote anything what was based on a press release? 2003? You've moved far far beyond PR now, surely. How will these new types of press release make your job easier?
2) PR people -- are you consulting with working journalists/bloggers while developing these new social media releases? Which journalists/bloggers? What are they saying? What is it they need that regular press releases don't provide?
Kevin, as usual you pinpoint the crux of the matter.
You are asking the right question here, what do I know about press releases? I get pre-briefed all the time, there is usually no need for press releases!
However, the truth is that we all refer to them in the course of our research and background checking. One late night when I wanted to go to bed but I still had a bunch of stuff I needed to check, verify, and quote, I had to look up company news releases and they were useless in addressing my needs.
I realized that there was a huge expense of human energy producing a product that was useless to me. Why not suggest a format that that could save me a click or three, hopefully much more.
Yes, this could be seen as a selfish project. But I know that if it makes me a little bit more productive, you and others will be able to save a few clicks too.
Have I tried working with any of these social media releases? Have they been tested by journalists?
Yes, I've worked with a few, and they have saved me some time. And I know they'll get better at making my job easier.
I also have anecdotal evidence of journalists that have been motivated to provide positive feedback to PR people about receiving press releases in a social media-like format.
Knowing other journalists I have to say that such feedback is rare and therefore has to be treated as significant.
The Social Media News Release is an obvious step in the right direction, it is an obvious application of our Internet technologies. What hasn't been noted is that the Social Media News Release comes with so much more than the old press release.
For example: it's trackability across media and blogs and Internet locations is easy and extremely valuable.
Another aspect of the the Social Media News Release is that it will continue to exist forever, cemented into the permalink archives of the Internet. It becomes a free floating publication in its own right with its own Google pagerank, and a Technorati following.
It could also be set up to collect comments for weeks or years, it's a live document. The collection of such information in such a manner is something that we never had a chance to consider before now.
We can go further, I have several ideas for new types of media entities I'd like to explore.
While lots of people talk about Web 2.0 and some have even tried to define Web 3.0 (blatantly obvious attempts to gain immortal Wikipedia juice, imho ;-) surely, we are barely at Internet 0.2?!
On the subject of the Internet, I am of a Bachman-Turner Overdrive opinion.
« First Annual Solstice Synchronized Global Orgasm for Peace | Main | Should Semel go? Is Yahoo a media company? Is that a good thing to be? (Yes, Yes, No.) »
December 9, 2006 | Permalink | Comment | Category: New/Social Media Release | Subscribe to SVW
- Top Stories:
- Technology In The Service Of Humanity
- The Death Of The Search Algorithm? Techmeme Has Six Editors
- TEDxSF - Little TED Just Like The Big TED
- SNCR Research: Social Media IS Influencing Business Decisions
- What's Next? Beyond Real-Time...
- PearlTrees: A Novel Approach To Human Mapping Of The Internet
- MediaWatch Analysis Part II: Google Has More To Lose Than Murdoch
- MediaWatch Analysis: Murdoch Will Negotiate Payment For Access To Basket Of Content With GOOG et al
- WeekendWatcher: The Sheer Number Of Things Will Devalue Them
- ChipWatch - Where Will The Next Generation Of Engineers Come From?
- Public Healthcare Could Cut Startup Costs And Help Spur Innovation
- Is GOOG's $750m AdMob Buy Strategic Or Dumb? An alternate view...
Comments (2)
Perhaps the issue is the extent to which the publishers are changing (see link below).
If editorial can be mashed and remashed and repurposed to catch the eyeballs, then they generate advertsing, sponsorship and brand value as and when published or from the long tail.
Tough for journalists who have to do the extra work but, in the long term valuable for publishing houses.
The pace of change is quite dramatic in the UK:
http://leverwealth.blogspot.com/2006/10/press-relations-is-re-born.html#links.
Posted: December 13, 2006 8:34 AM
David, yes indeed, these are exciting times to be in media and PR. Very challenging times too. The media is now starting to "get it" and is reorganizing. I'm not so sure that the reorganizations will save the old media. Just because they can see what is happening and make changes is no guarantee of success.
Remember the PC "revolution" the old guard finally figured things out, made changes but couldn't survive. My definition of a disruptive technology is one in which you can see the train wreck ahead of you, but you can't get off the tracks in time, you can't downsize, reorganise, etc in time. The PC killed so many computer companies, it nearly killed IBM, which had to turn into a services company.
The Internet is a media technology - that's where the disruption hits, in the media sector. In Internet 2.0, every company is a media company to a certain degree, every company is on the tracks.
Posted: December 13, 2006 5:13 PM