Time's person of the year should have been a blogger
By Tom Foremski - December 23, 2005
It's easy to give away money easily come by...Tom Foremski, Silicon Valley Watcher
We wuz robbed! I hope no Redmond gold was used to influence the Time magazine cover of Bill G and Melinda, and bizarrely, standing in-between them, Bono?
I hope Waggoner Edstrom--MSFT's PR firm--wasn't involved in influencing Time magazine. And that the PR company did not create mock-ups of Time magazine covers, (which is its usual practice to focus the minds of the Wag Ed troops on PR goals.)
Philanthropy is wonderful, but it's easy to do when the gold was acquired through illegal monopolistic practices. Isn't that what the courts said MSFT did?
The humble blogger, and the not so humble blogger, probably gave zilch to any charity this year, but, they should have been on the cover of Time. Surely, no other persons have had more effect on the global consciousness?
Blogging is people power at its best, and it should be celebrated, not the largesse of the rich.
Plus, blogging represents the Next Big Thing. It has ALL the characteristics of the Next Big Thing (don't be distracted by the sometimes wacky content.)
Another reason Time should have chosen a blogger: 2005 is the Chinese year of the Rooster. And the Rooster is a perfect metaphor for the blogger.
Last year was the year of the Monkey, and in the Chinese culture there are four monkeys, compared with our Western tradition of three monkeys: see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. The fourth monkey is: do no evil.
Interestingly, Google IPO'd in the Year of the Monkey, GOOG has a motto: do no evil.
We are coming to the end of the year of the Rooster/the year of the blogger. And if I had enough money to influence things, I would have put a blogger on the cover of Time.
2006 is the year of the Dog. What will that represent? Packs of new rules enterprises tearing apart the lumbering old world enterprises, imho.
« The crown jewels of the AOL-GOOG deal are not where you think they are... | Main | The blogosphere is grossly misunderstood and under-valued--Time will tell (. . . and eventually cover :-) »
December 23, 2005 | Permalink | Comment | Category: MediaWatch | Subscribe to SVW
- Top Stories:
- Tech Awards For Benefiting Humanity
- The Death Of The Search Algorithm? Techmeme Has Six Editors
- TEDxSF - Little TED Just Like The Big TED
- SNCR Research: Social Media IS Influencing Business Decisions
- What's Next? Beyond Real-Time...
- PearlTrees: A Novel Approach To Human Mapping Of The Internet
- MediaWatch Analysis Part II: Google Has More To Lose Than Murdoch
- MediaWatch Analysis: Murdoch Will Negotiate Payment For Access To Basket Of Content With GOOG et al
- WeekendWatcher: The Sheer Number Of Things Will Devalue Them
- ChipWatch - Where Will The Next Generation Of Engineers Come From?
- Public Healthcare Could Cut Startup Costs And Help Spur Innovation
- Is GOOG's $750m AdMob Buy Strategic Or Dumb? An alternate view...
Comments (4)
The people of the year are bonehead, boner and boneless?
Posted: December 24, 2005 10:31 AM
Oooh, that's a bit harsh--I usually don't allow such things here, but, it is Christmas...
And thanks for all the B'day wishes!
Posted: December 24, 2005 2:33 PM
Surely, no other persons have had more effect on the global consciousness?
Blogging is people power at its best, and it should be celebrated, not the largesse of the rich.
I would def disagree with both of your points.
Blogging is pretty much a joke typified by crap ideas masquearing as the online zeitgeist. Bloggers consistently make the mistake of extrapolating their
own conviction of self importance out into the offline world. Just because a multi million dollar
market may exist around something does not validate its essence in terms of cultural value.
Have you ever checked the size of the birthday
card market for one year old children?
Blogging is definitely not people power at its best. I dare you to go and realize how white
the blogojokesphere actually is today.
Power to what people? How about disempowerment
where bloggers repackage trends, ideas and attitudes and report them back to the "people"
thereby eliminating any real energy towards change.
Posted: December 27, 2005 1:12 AM
I think the GOOG motto is actually "Don't be evil." At least it started that way.
Posted: January 8, 2006 10:48 AM