USA Today's Kevin Maney to swell the bulging ranks of the blogosphere!
By Tom Foremski - October 6, 2005
It gives me great pleasure to introduce a new blogger, Kevin Maney, technology reporter and columnist for USA Today. I ran into Kevin recently in New York where we were speaking at the Impact '05 conference, and he is in town this week for the Web 2.0 conference.
Kevin told me he will start blogging towards the end of October, and I think he also said that he will be the first USA Today blogger, but, I need to check that.
Kevin's blog will be under the USA Today brand, and he will continue with his regular daily duties and responsibilities.
This is not uncommon these days, other publications now demand the same from their journalists, that they "blog" for their employer, as well as keep doing their day job.
That's why mainstream journalists hate the blogging phenomenon because it is extra work on top of an already stacked-high pile caused by newsroom cutbacks.
But that's not why Kevin wrote a column in January that was headlined: "Chill, blogophiles; you're not the first to do what you're doing."
Here is an excerpt, and here is the link to the entire piece.
These days, Internet blogs are all the rage. Blog-related companies such as Technorati and Six Apart have people in technology hyperventilating like it's 1999. Blogs are ripping down mainstream media and the ruling class! Blogs give power to the people! Everything is blogolicious!Jeez. Take a pill, all you blogomaniacs.
The column makes some fair points but its tone is clearly annoyed and frustrated, and very typical of many mainstream journalists, including myself when I was working at the Financial Times.
Paradoxically, journalists have tended to be the last people to "get it" in regards to blogging. We would see it exactly the way Kevin described things in his column, that it is just another way to publish things, a natural progression in lowering the cost of the printing press.
What Kevin, and myself missed however, is that the media technology that enables blogging, enables a two way communication. During Internet 1.0 we could broadcast our articles to anyone with a web browser. In Internet 2.0, we broadcast and receive back, and that is the kicker.
At the time Kevin's column appeared I said that such statements have a tendency to come back and bite-you-in-the-butt; there is never anything good to come from tempting the fates.
[That's why Google should change Do No Evil to something less fateful, like "Get 8 hours sleep every night and brush your teeth"--if the fates conspire against you, no harm done!]
http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2005/10/the_friday_wrap_3.php
« A Zigzag way to build a blog audience in record time | Main | Scoop: VeriSign is about to announce acquisition of Moreover Technologies... »
October 6, 2005 | Permalink | Comment | Category: MediaWatch | Subscribe to SVW
- Top Stories:
- Tech Awards For Benefiting Humanity
- The Death Of The Search Algorithm? Techmeme Has Six Editors
- TEDxSF - Little TED Just Like The Big TED
- SNCR Research: Social Media IS Influencing Business Decisions
- What's Next? Beyond Real-Time...
- PearlTrees: A Novel Approach To Human Mapping Of The Internet
- MediaWatch Analysis Part II: Google Has More To Lose Than Murdoch
- MediaWatch Analysis: Murdoch Will Negotiate Payment For Access To Basket Of Content With GOOG et al
- WeekendWatcher: The Sheer Number Of Things Will Devalue Them
- ChipWatch - Where Will The Next Generation Of Engineers Come From?
- Public Healthcare Could Cut Startup Costs And Help Spur Innovation
- Is GOOG's $750m AdMob Buy Strategic Or Dumb? An alternate view...
Comments (2)
Tom -- Great to see your blog about our conversation. I just wish you'd put in the rest of that paragraph I wrote in the column you quoted. It goes like this: "Jeez. Take a pill, all you blogomaniacs. Blogs are fun. Blogs add a fascinating new element to public discourse. But blogs are another turn of history's wheel, not a radical departure."
If the tone is annoyed and frustrated, it's because I continually get annoyed and frustrated with the tech industry's hype machine. Blogs have been over-hyped. No question. But that doesn't mean they're not a valuable new way to talk to an audience, and that's why I'm doing it.
See you in the blogosphere!
Kevin
Posted: October 8, 2005 8:18 PM
Kevin, methinks you were tryng to have your cake and eat it ;-)
Plus, how could I resist the opportunity for the headline! [It is such moments that reveal the hand of the supreme being!]
Paine and King were not bloggers BTW, it's a two way media. However, I totally agree with you about what lowering the cost of publishing does to society, which is why I firmly believe we ain't seen nothing yet. Bloggin represents a new class of what I call media techologies, which ARE the next big thing and which will shake up our culture and society in a massive way. We are heading into some scary, exciting times. My biggest concern is that as the old media crumbles at a faster rate, the new media business models are not yet in place and we are left with a big problem. Because media is how society thinks things through and moves forward. Our job as reporters is to help that process, help identify the real trends and issues from among all the noise. Will we have just a noisy blogosphere and an eviscarated mainstream media? How will that change things? I don't know...
Posted: October 9, 2005 1:02 PM