The corporation as publisher: Is Cisco's online magazine a sign of further challenges to an already beleagured media establishment?
By Tom Foremski - June 7, 2005
In my travels around Silicon Valley, Cisco stands out as one of the savviest in its use of new media technologies such as as RSS syndication feeds and blogging.
This might seem surprising, because Cisco is one of the oldest Silicon Valley companies and older cultures resist change. But Cisco is also in the business of communications, and its use of new media could be viewed as adding an eighth layer to the seven-layer communications stack. This additional layer consists of media technologies distributing content such as news, features, and ideas.
Cisco has begun to figure out the emerging "new communications" landscape. This landscape becomes visible when a corporation recognizes that it is both publisher and publication.
In fact, any large corporation can be viewed as a media company in that it constantly seeks to publish content. It publishes what could be called "sponsored" content in the form of company literature and advertising, and it constantly seeks to persuade others to publish its story. Corporations spend a lot of money influencing independent media organizations such as New York Times, Financial Times, Business Week etc, to publish their stories.
A general rule of thumb in the PR industry states that the ROI from influencing independent media coverage of a company is three times higher than an advertising campaign in the independent media.
In other words, money spent placing a story in the New York Times generates sales three times higher than the same amount of money spent on advertisements in the same newspaper.
[BTW, this is also why Google's contextual text ads are so effective because they blend in/become content.]
The new rules of corporate communications, however, are changing this picture. Cisco has found itself at the frontier of these changes, and it will be interesting to watch the company's initiatives closely.
Cisco online mag larger than most independent mags
Consider this: Cisco produces an online magazine called news@cisco that is run with the same journalistic standards as any computer trade magazine. It is the brain child of Dan Scheinman, Cisco's head of corporate communications - and head of M&A(!)
(Ron Piovesan, on Cisco's corporate communications team worked on news@cisco and he first told me about it in November 2004. And earlier this year I met Gretchen Ushakova, manager of internet PR, who runs news@cisco.)
Did you know that in just four years news@cisco has built an online readership larger than that of Investors Business Daily? And larger than the top computer trade newspapers and magazines?
Need I step you through what this means? I'll do it anyway because it resurrects a long word rarely seen since Internet 1.0 days: disintermediation. It is very likely that news@cisco is an example a potential trend that will lead to the disintermediation of established media on a massive scale. I would use capital letters except that it looks ugly.
If Cisco can take the next step, it's success will earn a place the history books (I'll explain what those are in part two :-)
EXTRAS:
Here is a very good description of news@cisco from the weblog of Robin Stavinsky at new venture marketing.
Interesting:
In Googling Dan Scheinman to double check spelling, it shows our SiliconValleyWatcher interview with Mr Scheinman in pole position. It seems that Google attributes extra value to independent sources of content, just as people do ...
« Mr. Unpredictable: Jobs Embraces Intel | Main | Scoop! Smile for the Google 3D mapping truck »
June 7, 2005 | Permalink | Category: New Rules | Subscribe to SVW
- Top Stories:
- Tech Awards For Benefiting Humanity
- The Death Of The Search Algorithm? Techmeme Has Six Editors
- TEDxSF - Little TED Just Like The Big TED
- SNCR Research: Social Media IS Influencing Business Decisions
- What's Next? Beyond Real-Time...
- PearlTrees: A Novel Approach To Human Mapping Of The Internet
- MediaWatch Analysis Part II: Google Has More To Lose Than Murdoch
- MediaWatch Analysis: Murdoch Will Negotiate Payment For Access To Basket Of Content With GOOG et al
- WeekendWatcher: The Sheer Number Of Things Will Devalue Them
- ChipWatch - Where Will The Next Generation Of Engineers Come From?
- Public Healthcare Could Cut Startup Costs And Help Spur Innovation
- Is GOOG's $750m AdMob Buy Strategic Or Dumb? An alternate view...
Comments
Andrew on Farmville valued $1B More Than Twitter By The Smart Money
The Microsoft deal with Facebook included an advertising deal--the $240M was for a share of the company and for the ad deal.
Thus, saying they bought at a valuation of $15B is significantly inaccurate.
Jonny on Die! Press release! Die! Die! Die!
I don't think so, press release is still one of the most effective, and yet, most underutilized, of publicity tools. Simply put, a press release is an announcement you send to magazines, trade journals, newspapers, and newsletters.
Jonny - registry fix review
Tom Foremski on Tech Giants Struggle With Copy And Paste...
George, sarcasm sometimes gets lost in translation, my apologies.
Daphne on Analysis: Could $GOOG Face Problems Outside Of China For Its Opposition To Chinese Government?
The Chinese governement has this stigma attached to it, basically don't mess with them. If google is mad enough to take them on, I wouldn't put it past them buying google and sacking the moron who made the decision.
George on Tech Giants Struggle With Copy And Paste...
And that significant lead will result from...adding something Apple has already added?
And that make sense to you?
Steve "@PodcastSteve" Lubetkin on Dirty Little Secrets: Social Media Is Terrible At Promoting Products
Tom, you and I are of the same mind on this. I am so tired of reading blogs or listening to podcasts or watching video embeds about social media people using social media to talk about social media. I really want to hear about specific business uses of social media. As I've said frequently, we need to remember that these tools are just communications channels, and we'll all be better off when w
Tom Nocera on Analysis: Financial Times Says GOOG Has Detailed Plans To Close China Search
An excellent analysis, Tom Foremski. I think there could be a great long term benefit for Google by its foray into China. By the timing of its very prominent presence there, coming during the great boom in Internet usage and awareness, Google's retreat, may become a kind of catalyst in the long term memories of tech savvy Chinese...the leaders of tomorrow. I forecast a triumphant return for G
Jonathan Mendez on Why Ad Networks And Exchanges Will Never Help Publishers
Great post. I believe publishers can have advertising supported businesses. In fact I don't think that's debatable. First though they need better tools to leverage their audience data and their own ad matching systems. Essentially they need to build a new improved display channel. New pub controlled networks could then emerge that would crush the performance of what exists today. Then all the
Tom Foremski on Is the Future Of News Dependent On The Generosity Of Billionaire Philanthropists?
Eric, What's wrong with making a reasonable profit as a news organization? I agree with you that there is a race to the bottom going on because the econopmics of online news continue to worsen.
At some point, we have to figure out how to reward news organizations doing a good job otherwise we are in serious trouble as a society. That's what I would like to see Mr Hellman's money go to
Tom Foremski on Techmeme's Gabe Rivera Is More Editor Than Aggregator...
Gabe: You should get a press pass and if you don't, you should ban SXSW stories from Techmeme. (SXSW gets very noisy, you'd be doing us all a big favor :)
Gabe on Techmeme's Gabe Rivera Is More Editor Than Aggregator...
Tom, two points:
1. You are a strange man.
2. Press passes cost $299? You sure? In any case I wasn't offered one. Please reread my tome on this matter: http://twitter.com/gaberivera/status/10238453895
Eric Westby on Is the Future Of News Dependent On The Generosity Of Billionaire Philanthropists?
Money is neither noble or ignoble. It is value-neutral.
You seem convinced that this project will be exclusively funded by the ultra-rich; obviously BANP's hope is that the community will step up and slowly allow the organization to be weaned off Hellman's seed money. I wish them luck -- but to be honest, the track record for local endeavors of this type isn't great so far. Still, I res
Tom Foremski on Techmeme's Gabe Rivera Is More Editor Than Aggregator...
Danny: I agree... But press passes aren't free this year. They cost $299. Gabe can afford $299.
Marshall Clark on The Dirty Little Secret About Marketing...
This sums it up perfectly:
'Advertising doesn't sell stuff' by Dave Trott
http://digg.com/u1Ps9L
Tom Foremski on Is the Future Of News Dependent On The Generosity Of Billionaire Philanthropists?
Eric: What's so noble about a non-profit status in regards to news organizations? What's so noble about relying on handouts from billionaires to produce local news?
If we can develop profitable news business models then we will have competition, and that is good for news, good for everyone.
San Francisco used to have more than a dozen daily newspapers. Each one trying to compe
Eric Westby on Is the Future Of News Dependent On The Generosity Of Billionaire Philanthropists?
While I'm no fan of the way the BANP has acquitted itself thus far, your comment that "There's plenty of 'non-profit' media businesses around, the largest local one is the San Francisco Chronicle." is glib to the point of meaninglessness.
As I'm sure you're aware, an organization's not-for-profit status is far more germane to its mission than to its ability to generate revenue. The Chro
Danny Sullivan on Techmeme's Gabe Rivera Is More Editor Than Aggregator...
Free the Gabe 1! The Techmeme 1?
Seriously, if there are any TV editors getting passes, then Gabe should. Press isn't just defined by writing stories.
Judy Shapiro on GOOG's Chief Economist Hal Varian Has No Solution For Newspapers
Actually, there is good news for publishers ... And it involves creating engagement experiences with the content rather than trying to sell content directly. (see some examples in this AdAge article: http://micurl.com/xijmu)
The key is create an experience that broadens the one:many experience of today's newspaper expereince with a socially connec
Judy Shapiro on Dirty Little Secrets: Social Media Is Terrible At Promoting Products
It is "underground" now because the consultants are pretending Social Media is a big "secret" worth $22K/ day (see my post on this - Is Chris Brogan Worth $22K?http://micurl.com/wpFeo)
As a client trying to buy social media services -- it is too hard today. There many little "bits" running around without a mature understanding of how to create value through a programmatic marketing ap
Ian Lamont on Techmeme's Gabe Rivera Is More Editor Than Aggregator...
I think many PR/communications professionals are still getting their heads around the new media world order. What's surprising here is this happened at SXSW.
Marshall Kirkpatrick on Techmeme's Gabe Rivera Is More Editor Than Aggregator...
Good stuff Tom. Did you see this interview with did with Megan McCarthy of Techmeme btw? http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/techmemes_new_editor.php
Tom Foremski on Dirty Little Secrets: Social Media Is Terrible At Promoting Products
Judy, yes, it is a new mdoel but is it already broken? One of my contacts told me that there is a lot of social media marketing going on but that it is underground. I thugh that the point is for it to be seen, rather than be 'underground.'
Tom Foremski on Why Ad Networks And Exchanges Will Never Help Publishers
Ted: Yes, I agree, some big roll ups on the way. Every week I'm introduced to yet another successful ad network I've never heard of, with tons of people and VC money. They have the upper hand right now, but ad networks are not a sustainable business long term, imho.
Ann Garrison on The Latest Pew Report Reveals Very Sophisiticated News Consumers
I agree re the sophisticated news consumer. Note that this consumer is probably more likely to respond to the news in some way as well.
Dave Kellogg on Why Ad Networks And Exchanges Will Never Help Publishers
Tom,
My biggest beef with the Poynter Online piece is the implication that auctions only work well for high priced goods which strikes as basically ridiculous.
In addition, I concur that the notion of creating artificial scarcity will not work either.
Fact of the matter is that there are too many *bad* advertising units out there that will get sold at rock-bottom prices
Judy Shapiro on Dirty Little Secrets: Social Media Is Terrible At Promoting Products
Actually Tom I disagree. Social media does work at promoting products. What you miss is a mature marketing approach to social media.
I personally could not find a social media agency - I did find lots of "social media consultants".
And social media is not just part of something else -- it is new corporate branding model. What is missing is marketing maturity - but it's coming...
Ted Rheingold on Why Ad Networks And Exchanges Will Never Help Publishers
I 100% agree. As you say Tom, there's just not enough liquidity in the marketplace. The only way such a market place would work is if every advertiser from P&G to the corner deli and every publisher from NYTimes to corner blog are all on the same network and all watching prices like an experienced market floor trader. The market places I hear envisioned aren't anywhere close to that and I expec
Tom Foremski on The Dirty Little Secret About Marketing...
Guy: I like that Drucker quote.
Madeline on Apple Rant: AppleCare = Shoddy Service - Apple Arrogance?
I had a very similar experience with Apple. My MacBook just wouldn't work after about 2 1/2 years of life, the logic board was replaced three times and the issue still wasn't fixed (not starting, turning off randomly, etc.) I had to FIGHT with Apple Service via phone to get a new computer issued, as the issues with the old one were obviously not fixable. The store was worthless, they couldn't e
Tom Foremski on The Dirty Little Secret About Marketing...
Marshall: Yes, you are right, bad marketing can ruin good products. Sometimes even good marketing and good products is no guarantee of success. I remember the excellent word of mouth marketing around Tivo, a great product, yet growth was still very slow.