&uot& Silicon Valley Watcher - reporting on the business of technology and media: Trend Watch Archives

Main

Trend Watch Archives

July 14, 2007

Are you a business or are you a widget?

Do you have a business or are you a widget?: It is a variation on Larry Ellison's question about enterprise software companies: do they provide features or solutions?

It works in this era too. I come across too many startups that are great widgets but poor businesses.

Take a look at Facebook this company has managed to roll up much of Web 2.0, Twitter, flickr, LinkedIn, etc. All into one page.

Saturday afternoon I spent 3 hours looking at YouTube through the my FaceBook portal. YouTube is a widget on FaceBook. A $1.6bn widget.

By Tom Foremski - July 14, 2007 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Trend Watch
Blog reactions | RSS Feed | SVW News Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW For Your Mobile Phone

July 19, 2007

Of Media Engineers and Media Architects...

I popped into Third Thursday over at Voce Communications (BTW my favorite valley PR firm.) I ran into lots of friends, Jen McClure, Shel Israel, Mike Manuel, Matthew Podboy (A surname from the future :-), Andrea Weckerle, and many more.

I love my friends but I'm a huge fan of Josh Hallett (Hyku). Josh epitomises what I call the media engineer, or, more accurately, a media architect. The days of the software engineer have peaked, now is the time of the media engineer.

[I define a media engineer as a cross between a software engineer versed in media technologies such as RSS, CSS, Flash, JavaScript, and HTML. With a media professional such as a publisher, editor, journalist (in any combination). . . And media engineers will thrive in this emerging Internet 2.0, two-way online era.]

I met Josh earlier this year at the New Comm Forum in Las Vegas where we were speaking on panels. Josh is interesting because he has been working with the New York Times and other large newspaper groups, helping media understand new media and respond in similar ways. And he has a thousand anecdotes and insights into what is going on.

I have some excellent video segments of Josh and co-panelist Alex Kim from SolutionSet coming your way very soon. In these segments there is easily $1m worth of advice, as you will see.

Links:

http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2007/03/widget_mania_pu.php

http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2005/08/the_coming_era.php

http://www.mguerrilla.com/media_guerrilla/

http://www.mguerrilla.com/media_guerrilla/2007/03/weckerle_joins_.html

http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail1067.html

http://www.sncr.org/

http://hyku.com/blog/

Third Thursday

http://publicrelations.meetup.com/79/

By Tom Foremski - July 19, 2007 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Trend Watch
Blog reactions | RSS Feed | SVW News Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW For Your Mobile Phone

August 26, 2007

The new California Gold Rush: Facebook apps

I spent Saturday afternoon in Palo Alto crammed into a room filled with about a hundred developers who were trading tips and sharing presentations on creating Facebook apps.

The enthusiasm was electric, it felt like the Homebrew Club, early pioneers encouraging each other.

Facebook has overwhelmed the web 2.0 social media sector in the same way hurricane Katrina overwhelmed New Orleans. It is a dramatic metaphor but a fair one.

If you are not thinking about developing Facebook apps then you should be. I've got great video coming from Saturday's Facebook Developer Garage that will appear on TechOne. Be sure to subscribe so you don't miss it. You won't regret it.

By Tom Foremski - August 26, 2007 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Trend Watch
Blog reactions | RSS Feed | SVW News Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW For Your Mobile Phone

September 28, 2007

imho: Too Much Long Tail . . .

It's the short fat part of the tail that matters. Yet I meet so many companies that miss significant opportunities.

So many startups have business plans that predict riches can be found in the long tail of commerce. Yet their first target should be the fat, high margin sector of any commercial market. You can always slide down the value chain over time and monetize the long tail.

Which is why you should be wary of companies that are focused on the long tail first rather than later.

Technorati Tags: ,

By Tom Foremski - September 28, 2007 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Trend Watch
Blog reactions | RSS Feed | SVW News Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW For Your Mobile Phone

January 31, 2008

Toktumi and Adify...

Toktumi and Adify are two companies that are worth singling out from this week's announcements at Demo 08 and elsewhere...

Toktumi is an interesting telephony startup. I spoke with Peter Sisson, the founder of Toktumi. He described the service as the "Skype of the hosted PBX market." It is focused on the very small business market, 1 to 9 employees is the sweet spot.

Getting started is easy, Toktumi provides a free phone number and you can use it with the Toktumi client software (PC only Mac is coming) to receive calls and call other Toktumi users through a regular phone. Additional lines are $12.95 per month plus 2 cents per minute and it can be set up in less than five minutes.

It has deals in the works with office retail stores so that you can walk in and buy a Toktumi phone and service. Calls go through its own data center so that you never miss a call. And developers can use the Toktumi API to develop telephony applications for small businesses such as dental or medical offices.

Unlike consumer VoIP offerings, Toktumi provides the advanced features businesses require, and a few they've never seen before. Auto-attendant, call transfer, visual voicemail, instant conferencing, and call waiting are all standard. Toktumi's unique search dialing capability allows calls to be placed by typing a name or keyword of the person or product desired. Mobility is automatic: calls ring wherever you login: at home, the office, a hotel, or your cell phone if you are on the road.

More info on Toktumi

Adify enables publishers to create advertising networks and then manage their advertising inventory in real-time and sell a wide variety of online ads according to geography and time of day. It provides clients with a dashboard that shows the performance of individual sites and individual advertising campaigns.

The company has been winning some large publishers such as Martha Stewart Publishing. But it can also be used by smaller publishers (Silicon Valley Watcher ad network coming soon!). Adify takes a cut of 12 per cent to 20 per cent of the advertising revenue.

Also, the company's platform has been certified by the IAB, which makes sure that its metrics accurately count advertising impressions. Only 12 ad serving technologies have this certification, says Joelle Gropper Kaufman, VP of marketing.

However, it doesn't work with RSS only with display ads on a web page. An interesting beta project is the development of widgets for distributing content between web sites within a network to help drive traffic.

Adify seems to be very well positioned for becoming the standard interface for the management of advertising networks.

More info on Adify.

Technorati Tags: ,

By Tom Foremski - January 31, 2008 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Tech Watch
Blog reactions | RSS Feed | SVW News Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW For Your Mobile Phone

March 22, 2008

Choking On The Long Tail - The Unbearable Burden

The business of the Long Tail is the concept that there is money to be made in services and products with a potential market of just a few people.

ChrisAnderson at TEDWe can see Internet companies exploiting such micro-markets everywhere, well before the concept was popularized by Chris Anderson, editor of Wired magazine in October 2004.

We see it in Amazon and Ebay, they host the many millions of small markets that are interested in obscure books or collectabilia.

We see it in Google, which monetizes interest in the most obscure parts of its index. We see it in MySpace and Facebook, which seek to monetize markets that can consist of many thousands of "friends" but are mostly groups of just a few dozen people.

The trick to success is to have as many Long Tail markets as possible. Each micro-market generates micro-profits therefore the more the better.

Selling free content...

If you can get that Long Tail content for free, that's the best kind because producing content is expensive. For example, Flickr, a Yahoo company, hosts people's photos for free. In exchange for free hosting it sells advertising around the photos.

Users come back to visit their photos, and they also share them with friends, and sometimes complete strangers are attracted to the photos too. That's a lot of free traffic and you can make money from traffic.

YouTube hosts people's videos for free and in exchange it sells advertising around that content. Again, as in the Flickr example, users created the content, and brought traffic to that content, and YouTube monetized that traffic.

Not a bad business model and one copied many times over: user generated content comes with its own viral marketing, which equals free monetizable traffic. And user generated content can sometimes catch much larger viral traffic, such as LonelyGirl15, or a skateboarding dog.

Facebook viral marketing tools built-in...

MySpace and Facebook are examples of trying to grab even larger amounts of user generated content. On Facebook I can upload my videos, photos, blog posts, movie tastes, etc.

It also provides me with viral marketing tools through my news feed which automatically informs my friends of what I've done, "Tom uploaded photos, Tom wrote a blog post," etc.) I didn't have to email, or text, or twitter anyone at all, Facebook did it all automatically.

Again, it is the same type of business model: user generated content of all types, aided by automatic viral marketing tools, creates more monetizable traffic.

This is the business of the Long Tail, making money from tiny markets. And this has been the business of the Internet in one form or another, for two decades.

How much can be made from the traffic to my YouTube videos? Not much. How much money can be made from traffic to my Flickr photos? Not much. But aggregate many millions of such tiny long tail markets and you can make billions in revenues and hundreds of millions in profits.

Profits from free content...

It's not a bad business: you get the content created for free, and you get the traffic for free. It is like having a shop with many customers buying products you obtained for free. Your cost is the store rent and cashiers to take the money.

Another cost is the warehouse space. In the online world the warehouse is your data storage systems, which is far, far cheaper than physical warehouse space. Hosting digital content such as photos, blog posts, video, digital books, etc is extremely inexpensive. That is why Google, Amazon, MySpace, etc, are profitable - their costs of doing business are less than their revenues.

As long as user generated content keeps flooding in, it brings its own traffic, and that fuels the business.

-As long as people keep creating new online content, Google will index it (and store a copy) and make money from the traffic that seeks that content.

-As long as people create content for free, and upload videos to YouTube, or photos to Flickr, the same business dynamics apply. As user generated content increases, it leads to more traffic, which leads to more profits.

The burden of free...

What would happen if user generated content decreased? Clearly, it would lead to less traffic and lower profits.

What could lead to a decrease in the amount of user generated content?

Consider this scenario:

The cost of hosting the massive amount of long tail content, all the photos, video, etc is very small. As the amount of this content increases, the hosting costs rise.

As long as traffic also rises, the costs of business remain in balance with the rise in revenue.

But traffic growth is limited. There is a limited number of people in the world, there is a limited number of hours in a day. There are fundamental limits to the rate of growth of traffic.

But the amount of content collected by Google, Flickr, or YouTube, for example, grows much faster, and there is ever more of it that has to be stored and hosted. There is a legacy mountain of content and it's becoming a mountain range.

That means expanding your data storage systems, that means more power needed to drive those systems, it means administering the storage systems, which is people intensive, the data has to be made secure, the data has to be backed up. These are the exponential rising business costs of Long Tail economics.

As the number of long tail micro-markets increases, the less profitable each one becomes. This is because each long tail micro-market competes with an increasing number of other long tail micro markets.

More of any product or service means less revenue for that product or service. A current example: more housing on the market means a lower price for housing. Same thing applies in any market.

There is no way that increases in Internet traffic can keep pace with the growing number of long tail micro-markets.

The costs of hosting long tail micro-markets will continue to increase until they exceed the profits that can be made from them.

I was recently speaking with David Scott, CEO of 3PAR data storage systems, and he pointed out why 3PAR stays away from certain markets.

I might view a photo of my grandma, and that might be once a year or less. Yet that data still has to be hosted, secured, managed, and backed up. What is the business case for that photo? The cost of keeping that photo and others like it, will continually force companies to cut their storage costs and that will lead to them to storing the data themselves on cheap disk drives.

High traffic from skateboarding puppies, or Brittany Spears photos can subsidize hosting Mr Scott's grandma photos but that is only true for now.

At some point, businesses will be chocking on the costs of supporting the Long Tail of data that makes up their micro-markets. The costs of the Long Tail will twist tighter around the neck of profitability. What happens then?

Dump the grandma photos...

Companies have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders to maximize profits. They will have to dump the data, dump the grandma photos.

That means dumping the many links that users created to their content. The idea of permalinks, links that will remain rooted forever in the concrete of the Internet will become a fallacy.

Even though the online companies make no guarantee in their terms of service that users' content will be always available there is an implicit guarantee that user content will be always be there. When that implicit contract is broken users will be less willing to spend all that time uploading and tagging their content.

They'll be less willing to tell their friends about it, to post links to it, etc, because there is no guarantee it will be there next year or beyond.

That's the scenario that will dry up the flood of user generated content to online firms. And that is the great flaw in the business of the Long Tail.

Businesses making money from the economics of the Long Tail will be dragged under by mounting costs of maintaining Long Tail micro-markets.

Maybe this should be the title of my upcoming book: "The Unbearable Burden of the Long Tail - How Internet Commerce Will have to hack-off the Long Tail to Survive."

[Saturday Post is the name of a series of essays. This is the first in that series.]

Please also see:

Long Tail Economics - Bonanza or Bogus

Have we misinterpreted the business value of the long tail?

By Tom Foremski - March 22, 2008 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Trend Watch
Blog reactions | RSS Feed | SVW News Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW For Your Mobile Phone

April 3, 2008

Out & About: Entrepreneurs Talking About Recession- Are Angel Investors In Trouble?

Recession, what recession? That's what it feels like in and around Silicon Valley. There is a lot of VC money being poured into startups so it feels as if we are recession proof, recession is what happens on the TV, somewhere else and not here.

That's what it might feel like but that's not what is potentially lurking below the surface. In conversations with local entreprenuers I'm hearing more stories about funding problems because of the recession, the real estate market slump, and the investment banking crisis.

In one story, a startup that had $7m in funding promised by large angels (arch-angels) lost much of it because the investors had lost money in real estate. Also, some angel investors have lost money because of Bear Stearns and now have less to to fund startups.

Angels gone?

The loss of the angel investors is potentially a big problem because Silicon Valley VC firms have outsourced much of the seed investing to the angels. The angel investors are a more important generator of the next wave of startups now than ever before, this could hurt Silicon Valley. [Please see: Jeff Clavier.]

I was at Lunch 2.0 at Ogilvy PR on Tuesday and I ran into James Hong, one of the founders of Hot or Not, a tremendously succesful web site. Hot or Not was sold in February to private equity firm Avid Life Media, for a reported $20m. He said fears of the recession were the prime reason Hot or Not was sold. "I'm telling all my friends to either get out now or buckle up for the long term."

"I'm not going to plan my next venture until it is clear what is going on with the economy," he said. I pointed out that Silicon Valley always produces its best ventures in a recession, Hot or Not came out of the recession. He nodded but said that with a new venture it is important to know how the economy will play out.

Jeff Nolan, a former venture capitalist and now at Newsgator, said that a lot of money moved away from VC funds and into hedge funds. Now, the large institional investors will be rebalancing their portfolios and more money will come into VC funds.

James Fisher, a local entrepreneur says that M&A in the valley is going to be disrupted by the turmoil in the investment banking sector. Investment Banking Crisis Will Freeze Silicon Valley M&A Deals

By Tom Foremski - April 3, 2008 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Trend Watch
Blog reactions | RSS Feed | SVW News Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW For Your Mobile Phone

April 16, 2008

Arrington Should Watch Out Because J.B. Is About . . . Ad Networks Will Roll Up Media Companies

The economics of the online media business are terrible. Decent journalism can't be supported on a pageview model. At least not yet.

There are some rapidly growing publishers in the tech space such as Michael Arrington's TechCrunch, GigaOm, and VentureBeat. They all make heavy use of an advertising network, in this case Federated Media Publishing (FM), founded by John Battelle, the search guru. And there are other online publishers that have become high flyers in fashion, food and woman's sites that also use FM.

FM takes about a 40 per cent cut of advertising revenues, but each deal with its some 200 publishers is private, so its share could be higher. It's a nice margin and well deserved compared with other networks because FM goes out and bangs on doors and sells ads.

But at some point soon, FM's largest publishers are going to be large enough that they won't need FM any longer. They'll do it themselves or sell to a higher bidder. For example FM lost Digg last year to Microsoft.

I was interested to see that FM Publishing recently raised funding that was reported to be as much as $50m.

That sounds like a war chest to me.

If I was Mr Battelle I would start buying up my online publishing partners. FM can monetize its publishers better than they can. FM knows exactly how much traffic, and the quality of the traffic hitting its publishers, it knows their business very well.

By acquiring their publishing partners they get an immediate boost in advertising revenues, they get to keep 100 per cent--nothing needs to be shared. And J.B. is a former publisher he understands how to run a media company.

The math is compelling. Ad networks will start buying up online publishers because: they'll make more money, they won't get dumped, and they can monetise online content far better than the online publishers currently can.

Of course it could go the other way (except where is the publisher's war chest...?) There is more here about the potential publisher strategy.

- - -

Please see: Arrington's Roll-Up The Blogs Strategy Won't Work

Please see Sramana Mitra's excellent recent analysis: Federated Media Needs to Focus

In 2007, FM raked in a revenue of $22 million, out of which $14 million went to the publishers. That indicates a gross margin of 36%. After deducting the operating expenses, what remains is a thin operating margin, not one that should bring forth a very large multiple.


On the positive side, some of the blogs that FM represents are earning over $50,000 per month, although Mike Arrington (Techcrunch) keeps complaining that they don’t sell enough of his inventory.

By Tom Foremski - April 16, 2008 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Trend Watch
Blog reactions | RSS Feed | SVW News Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW For Your Mobile Phone

April 17, 2008

Wish Everyone Well...

Wish everyone well . . . the market will take care of dumb competitors

By Tom Foremski - April 17, 2008 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Trend Watch
Blog reactions | RSS Feed | SVW News Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW For Your Mobile Phone

About Trend Watch

This page contains an archive of all entries posted to Silicon Valley Watcher - reporting on the business of technology and media in the Trend Watch category. They are listed from oldest to newest.

Tom Watch is the previous category.

VC Watch is the next category.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.34