Main

Clean Tech Archives

March 14, 2007

Tech CEOs' Green Report Calls for Government Green$$

Tech CEOs go to Washington D.C:

TechNet announced its green tech policy agenda during "TechNet Day,” the organization's sixth annual trip to the nation's capital for CEO meetings with leaders in Congress and the Administration.

 (The full report is available here: http://www.technet.org/resources/GreenTechReport.pdf)

 

Some of the proposals:

      o Double federal funding for basic energy research
       o Enhance the federal government's role as purchaser of new energy technologies
       • Fundamental reform of federal tax policy to spur the development and adoption of new energy technologies
       o Increase the level of incentives to spur new energy technologies
       o Restructure incentives to enable market signals that drive new technologies
       o Encourage technology neutrality enabling the marketplace to pick winners
       o Establish an effective tradable Renewable Energy Certificate marketplace
       o Enable utilities to recover investments in renewable generation and transmission
       

It is all good stuff. But waiting for the government to do these things is like waiting for the government to admit that global warming was a problem in the first place. It takes way too long and the action is needed now.

Silicon Valley should be able to figure out the business models for innovation in clean energy and related "green" markets without government help.

Subsidies and government programs remove the effect of market conditions that test business models.  And it can leave worthy green ventures at the mercy of future political decisions. That's a risk that investors don't need.

TechNet and other tech related lobby groups have been spectacularly unsuccessful in Washington, D.C. Their time might be better spent just getting on with it at their own companies and within their own industry.

(The full report is available here: http://www.technet.org/resources/GreenTechReport.pdf)

March 4, 2007

3.5.07 Cleantech companies litter the Valley

The Chronicle ran a front-page look at the Valley's cleantech industry (or "green tech" - reporter David Baker emphasizes that the industry is so new it hasn't settled on nickname yet), profiling some of the new and more established companies in the area.

There's Menlo Park's Solazyme, which is genetically engineering algae to produce oil. They recently picked up a financing round from Berkeley's Roda Group. The current interest in cleantech is a welcome change for such companies. A few years ago, Valley VCs were a lot less interested.

We'd go talk to biotech VCs, and they'd say, 'This is interesting, but we know nothing about this energy business," said Harrison Dillon, Solazyme's chief executive officer.

Then there are more established companies, like SunPower in San Jose, which makes highly efficient solar powers. It brought in $236.5 million in revenue last year, up 200 percent from $78.7 million the year before. Its profit hit $26.5 million.

Competing with SunPower is Santa Clara-based Miasolé, of Santa Clara, which will soon start producing "thin-film" solar panels.

Rather than collect the sun's energy with silicon wafers, the traditional solar technology, Miasolé uses a combination of copper, indium, gallium and selenium -- all deposited on razor-thin, stainless steel sheets.

Thin-film cells don't convert sunlight to electricity as efficiently as silicon cells. But Miasolé's process for making cells will be far cheaper, said Chief Executive Officer David Pearce.

If all goes as planned, Miasolé should be able to cut the production cost of solar cells by 70 percent, Pearce said, making solar power far more competitive with other ways of generating electricity.

February 26, 2007

2.26.07 Green Grid announces board, releases papers

The Green Grid, a consortium of major computer and power companies dedicated to lowering power consumption in data centers, announced its board of directors today and released three white papers on energy-efficient data centers, CNET News.com reports.

The board is composed of Advanced Micro Devices, Intel, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Microsoft, Sun Microsystems, Rackable Systems, Spraycool, VWware and American Power Conversion.

The white papers are:

  • "The Green Grid Opportunity," which identifies both short-term and long-term objectives to increase the energy efficiency of datacenters and IT infrastructure equipment.
  • "Guidelines for Energy Efficient Data Centers," which provides a framework for improving the efficiency of both new and existing data centers.
  • "The Green Grid Metrics: Describing Data Center Power Efficiency," which explains the use of the Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) metric, along with its reciprocal the Data Center Efficiency (DCE) metric.

February 20, 2007

2.20.07: Australia to ban incandescent lightbulbs

The Australian government is banning old-fashioned lightbulbs. In four years, only energy-efficient lightbulbs will be available, AP reports.

Legislation to gradually restrict the sale of the old-style bulbs could reduce Australia's greenhouse gas emissions by 4 million tons by 2012 and cut household power bills by up to 66%, said Environment Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Australia produced almost 565 million tons of greenhouse gases in 2004, official figures show.

A good start, putting Australia in the company of California, which is just considering a measure to ban the sale of incandescent lightbulbs. Conservatives oppose the measure because it takes away consumers' right to choose their lightbulb technology.

Environmentalists caution, though, that industry, not lightbulbs are the major cause of global warming - and Austrlia's John Howard is a steadfast opponent of the Kyoto Protocols.

"It is a good, positive step. But it is a very small step. It needs to be followed through with a lot of different measures," Australian Conservation Foundation spokesman Josh Meadows told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio.

February 16, 2007

2.16.07: Cleantech investment skyrocketing

VC investment in cleantech companies hit $3.6 billion in 2006 (that includes North American and European investors), a 45% increase over 2005's $2.5 billion. The fourth quarter saw a 10% increase of investment over the previous year, from $704 million to $775 million, according to a Cleantech Venture Network press release.


Naturally, most of that money - 72% - went into energy-related investment. That represents a $2.6 billion investment, double the $1.3 billion invested in 2005.

Still, Nicholas Parker, co-founder of the Cleantech Venture Network, said other sectors also benefited from the investment boom.

“Energy was the most prominent beneficiary, but companies that specialize in transportation, water, air and environmental technologies and other categories also attracted venture capital,” he said.

February 15, 2007

2.15.07: Data centers gobble up only 1% of US energy bill

Are data centers contributing to global warming or the energy crisis? A new study commissioned by AMD says no: While data center energy consumption has doubled from 2000 to 2005 and now matches the consumption of the state of Mississippi, it's still only 1.2 percent of total US consumption.

SF Chron: Demand grows, but data centers don't hog power

That's massively less than previous estimates that Internet power use was as much as 13 percent.

"If you see that there might be a problem, you have to ask how big is the problem," Jonathan Koomey, a scientist at Lawrence Berkeley and the author of the study, said. "The purpose of the study is to give a reasonable estimate of how much electricity is used. From that, you can then figure out whether there are actions that industry can take or that government can take."

Still, it's a huge increase and AMD's John Fruehe says customers were starting to max out their energy budgets. Both to save money and to retool to be less polluting, companies are looking at how to make data centers more energy efficient.

Chandrakant Patel, a research scientist at Hewlett-Packard Labs, said tech companies need to focus on every aspect of the data center, from the microprocessor to the air-conditioning system. "You really must look at the stack," he said. "It has to be addressed holistically."

2.15.07: CleanTech Expo SF

If you're interested in the growing cleantech industry, check out the CleanTech Expo XII next week in San Francisco. Pressing concerns about climate change plus a widespread re-engineering of American business to reduce greenhouse gas emissions means clean technology will play an increasingly important role in Silicon Valley. I'll be reporting from the conference Monday and Tuesday.

From a press advisory we received:

Cleantech Forum XII will be held at the San Francisco Marriott (SOMA) on February 19-21 and will feature technologies that will develop alternative energy, increase energy efficiency and mitigate global warming - while making money.

Attracting nearly 400 venture capitalists and entrepreneurs, the SF Cleantech Forum provides first-hand access to cleantech leaders. Key speakers include Vincent Chornet, Enerkem; Chris Poirier, Coaltek; Jan-Olaf Willums, Th!nk Electric Car Company; Bob Epstein, Environmental Entrepreneurs; Dan Kammen, Berkeley Institute of the Environment; Alexander Karsner, Department of Energy; Jonathan Lash, World Resources Institute; Amory Lovins, Rocky Mountain Institute; and Governor Edward Rendell of Pennsylvania.

February 14, 2007

2.14.07: HP cuts emissions with new packaging

HP's redesigned print catridge and packaging will reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 37 million pounds this year, the company said last week.

HP estimates its redesigned print cartridge packaging will eliminate the use of nearly 15 million pounds of materials, including 3 million pounds of corrugated cardboard in 2007. The packaging also will eliminate the use of more than 6.8 million pounds of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic through material reduction and substitution of recycled content plastic and paperboard.

The release quotes Greg Norris, Ph.D., environmental life cycle assessment instructor at Harvard University: "What I see here is smart design. The changes all go in the right direction environmentally and all in ways that make economic sense to HP and its customers. More power to these designers."

2.14.07: 'Digester' tech turns cow poop into power

cows.jpgPG&E has agreed to buy three billion cubic feet of cow-produced methane (otherwise known as "renewable natural gas") from Central Valley-based BioEnergy Solutions, enough hot air to provide electricity to 50,000 California homes, according to a press release.

"BioEnergy Solutions was founded by dairymen, and we understand the challenges agriculture faces in the coming years to reduce emissions," said Albers, a third-generation dairyman. "PG&E has a similar challenge, which is to increase its production of renewable energy. This agreement turns what would otherwise be a growing problem for farmers into a new revenue source and helps PG&E reach the environmental goals set by the company and the state."

Here's how it works, reports Green Wombat:

BioEnergy Solutions will install methane digesters at dairies, where manure will be pumped into covered lagoons. As methane is released from the decomposing manure, the digester will remove the carbon dioxide and impurities before piping the gas to a PG&E plant to be burned to produce greenhouse gas-free electricity.

Albers says BioEnergy will install and operate the digesters at no cost to dairy owners while giving them a share of the gas sales (he wouldn't say how much) and any renewable energy credits that result. "Even though there’s been a lot of digester technology out there, there's never been a situation where the dairyman can share in the profits," Albers says.

The solution is a win for PG&E because by 2010 they have to be delivering 20 percent of their electricity by renewable energy sources. It's a win for the environment because methane is a powerful greenhouse gas. And it's a win for Albers and California dairies because they're getting paid for the stuff.

And it's no skin off the cows' noses.

February 8, 2007

2.8.07: SJ landed Nanosolar with green cred, modest bucks

San Jose didn't spend $20 million to lure solar-cell "printer" Nanosolar to Silicon Valley, as the California Assembly is considering giving to Tesla Motors. The city's $1.5 million incentive, far less than what Nevada and Arizona were offering, was sufficient - coupled with the Valley's commitment to cleantech and the benefits of being in the technology hub.

Paul Krutko, director of the San Jose Office of Economic Development, told the Green Wombat blog that SJ doesn't just flash greenbacks, it builds green.

San Jose touts its green building initiatives - it opened the world's first LEED (Leadership in Environmental Design) certified public library - and cites local companies' efforts to fight global warming. Software maker Adobe's downtown San Jose headquarters, for instance, has been rated the greenest corporate building in the United States.

Green tech companies, says Krutko, are "looking at communities that have an approach to sustainability. It is very much a competitive advantage in having a community that really gets it in dealing with the global issues we’re facing in terms of climate change and global warming."

Ultimately, Krutko says, it's not about tax incentives. Speaking like a true Valley guy, he says, ""Our currency is really about time to market. Market entitlements and the ability for a company to find space and quickly occupy that space and move forward."

San Jose invests in a Pacific Community Ventures fund that will finance local companies. It's also streamlining the permitting process and changing zoning regs to accomodate green companies.

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

2.8.07: Gore to Valley: Tech is key to climate fight

Al Gore speaking at the Joint Venture Silicon Valley conference last week, following the release of UN report that makes it crystal clear that climate change is real and human-initiated:

"If information technology and biotech have been the mainstays in recent years, it's abundantly obvious that cleantech, greentech ... will be a new pathway that attracts a lot more investment and time and attention. ... I'm here today in part to encourage that ongong phenomenon. The world faces an unprecedented challenge and Silicon Valley can play an unprecedented part in facing that challenge. I say this not to flatter you. I say it because its very simply true and because I want to further encourage what many of you have already decided and perhaps in the process encourge others to join in this as well."

Watch the Video clip | News.com coverage

JVSV reported that VC investments to cleantech increased 266 percent last year, with investments of about $300 million by the third quarter alone, News.com said.

Gore emphasized just how critical technology is to the effort to combat climate change.

"Technology is the key to giving us enough leverage to change the pattern that is now causing the climate crisis. The old and traditional patterns by which a new suite of technologies replace the old has to be examined and changed," he said. "Government policies can play a significant role, but the most significant role will be played here by you."

February 7, 2007

State considering $20m subsidy to Tesla

Far and away the hottest car in the world is a Tesla, which boasts Google's Larry Page and Sergey Brin as investors. The Tesla Roadster is an all-electric two-seater that does 0 to 60 in four seconds and delivers the equivalent of 135mpg. This baby goes for a cool hundred grand.

Tesla Motors is ready to dive into a more affordable part of the electric market - a four-door sedan that will sell for only $50,000. The company is considering locating the assembly plant for "Whitestar" project in California, New Mexico and Michigan.

To help Tesla choose California, Assemblyman Kevin DeLeon (D-Los Angeles) introduced a bill to fund a clean technology fund by adding $4 to the auto registration fee, which would produce $45 million in tax revenue. Politicians want to give $20 million of that to Tesla as an incentive to build in California, probably in Pittsburg.

That public investment comes on top of an investment by the state's big pension funds - CalPERS, CalSTRS and CalCEF - into venture capital firms. One of the funds that receives pension fund money is VantagePoint Venture Partners, and one of VantagePoint's investments is Tesla.

Mercury News reporter Vindu Goel complained in his blog about investing so much money in one company:

As promising as Tesla seems to be, it’s a lot of taxpayer money to give to one company–especially one that could raise the extra $20 million from VCs in, oh, about four seconds, if it wanted to.

A state clean technology fund is best used to fund research. Once a product becomes viable (and Tesla has already taken deposits on 270 cars to be built in England and delivered starting this fall), it’s time for the private investors to step in.

And at VentureBeat, Matt Marshall worries that the state is playing fast and loose with taxpayer dollars.

Ironically, while green companies are sprouting up everywhere as a result, the state is now considering having to pay them to stay in California, now that the companies are actually about to create jobs.

I talked to Daryl Siry, Tesla's VP of marketing, to straighten out what's going on here.

First, Siry said, taxpayers are not directly investing in Tesla through the pension funds. The funds, which invest retirement funds for public employees, are investing in VC firms like VantagePoint. "If CalSTRS is invested in VantagePoint, that's CALSTRS' business, and if VantagePoint is investing in Tesla, that's a good business investment for VantagePoint," Siry said. To say that the funds are investing in Tesla is like saying they invest in McDonalds, he said. They invest in many funds that are in turn invested in many, many businesses - all with the goal of maximizing returns for the pensioners.

Indeed, a VentureBeat commenter, Max, points out:

"CALPRERS and CALTRF are not taxpayer’s money. They are the property of pension owners like school teachers. We teachers trust venture capitalists like Vantage Point to invest our money in order to make our retirement funds grow. Many of the top-shelf VCs invest retirement fund monies."

Marshall points out that taxpayers could foot the bill if the pension managers make bad investment decisions. That's not the same as the funds being public money and it certainly doesn't give the state oversight power over VantagePoint's investments.

More important is the $20 million that Sacramento is thinking about raising. The total cost of the project will probably run to $100 million and create 300 jobs.

"Locating a plant is a very important decision where we have to take into account a number of factors: labor pool, labor costs, housing costs, logistics costs, since our supply chain exists around the world)," Siry explained. "We look a wide range of characteristics. If you look at any major capital expenditure, you will find the governments of most states want to bring those projects to their states ... and they provide incentives to the companies."

"It's not my job or anyone at Tesla's job to do the math for the people in Sacramento or Albequerque to figure out the cost-benefit analysis. Is it fair for taxpayers to fund this? That's a calculation made by the lawmakers."

At least some lawmakers think so, not just for the 300 jobs that would be created but for the long-term prospect of a major cleantech car company being based in California.

``If they want to grow to the scale they're talking about, the government will be very supportive of them,'' Assemblyman Mark DeSaulnier, D-Martinez, said. ``If we can put thousands of electric cars on the road, the government will want to support the subsidies.''

So what kind of scale are we talking about? Tesla has taken 325 preorders for the Roadster sportscar and has a goal of selling 1,000 cars in 2008, although Siry said he expects to sell more than that next year. The Whitestar project is a $50,000 five-seat, four-door sedan - still kinda a lot for any car, much less a family sedan. Is Tesla an elite car company or will they eventually get to a real middle-class price point?

"We would love to," he said. It's a question of creating enough scale to make mass production economically viable. "When cell phones came out they were a new technology and expensive. Today everyone has a cellphone. No one has developed to date an viable electric vehicle. "We've developled a unique technology around our drivetrain. In order to succeed in the long term, we need to start at the top and work down the pyramid. You need to start at a high price point and develop volume. Frankly the technology is expensive today. When we have the volume we'll be able to compete at lower prices."

February 6, 2007

2.6.07: Cleantech investments skyrocket to $7 billion worldwide

Investment in cleantech companies surged in 2006 from $2.7 billion to $7.1 billion, a 167% jump, reports GreenBiz.com.

Investment in biofuels increased more than four times, from $647 million in 2005 to $2.8 billion in 2006. Averge deal size seems to be increasing, as the number of deals only increased 31% to 354.

Investment in solar was up 210%, from $451m to $1.4bn, driven by initiatives such as California's 'Million Solar Roofs' and attempts to overcome the shortage of silicon both by building more capacity and through investment in technologies that use less silicon.

Wind investment more than doubled from $307m to $821m, but most of the investment in the sector is directed towards asset finance because the technology is relatively mature and the business model is proven.

Other low carbon technologies, including energy efficiency, smart distribution, carbon markets, fuel cells and hydrogen grew by 74% from $979m to $1.7bn but individually each sector remains relatively small.

First round venture capital raising increased from $217m to $339m, suggesting that the search for technological solutions still has some way to go. Second round financings actually dropped but a big jump in third rounds, from $261m to $675m, signifies that many technologies are coming of age.

2.6.07: Berkeley gets $500m grant to fund energy research

Ever on the cutting edge of progressive ideas, UC Berkeley has won a large grant to develop new biofuels, reports the San Francisco Chronicle.

The $500 million grant from British Petroleum Group will go to creating an internatinal research hub at Berkeley to develop clean energy fuels.

BP is one of the largest oil companies in the world. Last June the company announced it it would fund half a billion dollars over 10 years to conduct research on alternative fuels, and was looking to find an academic institution to host the project.

The center will fund "radical research aimed at probing the emerging secrets of bioscience and applying them to the production of new and cleaner energy, principally fuels for road transport," according to an announcement on the company's Web site.

Cal beat out other universities in the U.S. and England because Gov. Schwarzenegger's recent efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions persuded BP to put the money in California.


"California is yet again leading the world on clean energy," said Adam Mendelsohn, Schwarzenegger's communications director.

2.6.07: Bush boosts funds for renewable energy tech

President Bush's budget proposal includes $1.2 billion for renewable energy sources, out of total request of $24.3 billion for the Department of Energy. That's a $60 million, or five percent increase, over last year's budget, according to Renewable Energy Access. And that jump has the emerging cleantech industry pretty happy.

"We applaud the Administration for continuing to support the President's Solar America Initiative (SAI) at robust funding levels. The Administration's FY 2008 budget request calls for $137 million in funding for the SAI, a major new R&D effort to achieve cost-competitive solar energy technologies across all market sectors by 2015," Rhone Resch, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association, said

But in a press release, Resch warned that the request also includes marginal amounts for several critical aspect of the industry.

At the same time, the administration's request funds solar water heating research at just $2 million and concentrating solar power at just $9 million. ... Moreover, the budget does not include a long-term extension of the Federal solar investment tax credits, which is the single most important policy affecting solar development."

The 2008 budget request also includes $2.7 billion for Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative, which is supposed to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign energy sources by promoting renewable energy technologies, such as biomass, hydrogen and solar, clean coal technologies, and nuclear energy technologies, through the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership.

September 25, 2006

5 Clean Tech winners in SF will receive $500,000

Tuesday morning at a special event hosted by Gavin Newsom, mayor of San Francisco, the five winners of the California Clean Tech Open will be announced.

The winner in each category—energy efficiency, smart power, renewable energy, transportation and water management—will receive a $50,000 cash infusion plus office space and legal, accounting and public relations services worth another $50,000. In short, winners get the means to get their enterprise off the ground.

Finalists include:

  • "SoCool" has developed a solar-powered air-conditioning unit for automobiles.
  • "Hive Power" aims to become a utility that uses only renewable energy sources.
  • "Crystal Clear" reduces the cost of purifying water to 1.5 cents per gallon.
  • "Reclaim Electric" regenerates wasted heat from computers, HVAC and other sources as usable electricity.
  • "Meridian Design" has designed a $20 retail water purification system that  uses ultraviolet light to eliminate all water-borne pathogens.

Clean Tech has become a fast growing sector in Silicon Valley.

Link to CNN:  Silicon Valley goes solar

June 14, 2005

Retrobox.com: green riches in the muck and junk of the digital age

. . .and a call for an environmental tax credit

By Tom Foremski and Nick Aster for SiliconValleyWatcher

Corbin.jpgBloggers have to eat, and if it is possible to combine good food with good conversation, so much the better. Which is why my colleague Nick Aster and I headed over to the Town Hall on Tuesday for lunch with Stampp Corbin, CEO and co-founder of Retrobox.com, a very ambitious and profitable computer recycling company.

There is money to be made in handlng the muck and junk of the digital age, and Mr Corbin is happy to spread the word because his company has a business model that works incredibly well.

But it is not just about finding a safe way to dump a computer monitor (8lbs of toxic materials in each) it is also about data security, creating an asset trail, and the regulatory compliance demanded in various industries.

"Data security is a big deal and one that some companies forget," says Mr Corbin. "Fortune 1000 companies will spend tens of milions of dollars on firewalls to protect a server - and the next day that server is replaced and sold on Ebay along with its now unprotected data."

Continue reading "Retrobox.com: green riches in the muck and junk of the digital age" »

About Clean Tech

This page contains an archive of all entries posted to Silicon Valley Watcher - reporting on the business of technology and media in the Clean Tech category. They are listed from oldest to newest.

Cisco [CSCO] is the previous category.

Consumer Tech is the next category.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.34