Retreevo Study Discovers Vacuous iPhone Users
By Tom Foremski - November 3, 2009
Retreevo, the electronics retail store, has published the results of a study of iPhone users:
The highlights:
- iPhone users are more attracted by a partner's cool gadgets than their college degree.
- 20% of iPhone users watch adult material on their phones (seems very high to me.)
- One third think "old gadgets" are a "turn-off."
- one-third have broken up with their partners by text or email.
- one-quarter have broken up with their partner because they spent too much time on their mobile device (I'm not surprised they spent a lot of time on their mobiles if this is the kind of iPhone user typified by the above behavior.)
I use an iPhone but I don't identify with any of these iPhone users.
« ResearchGate: A Network For Sharing Scientific Research Results Both Good And Bad | Main | Nvidia Could Be Prepping Intel Compatible Chips »
Posted to
November 3, 2009 | Permalink | Comment | Subscribe to SVW
- Top Stories:
- Silicon Valley Goes To Paris... Le Web '09
- Turkey's Search Engine And The Backlash Against The Internet's 'Wal-Marts'
- A Saturday Post: Media In Crisis: I'm Thankful For Being Here Right Now...
- Guest Post: Social Media Marketing is Swiss Cheese
- A Single Search Index Would Speed Up The Entire Internet - A Zero Carbon Speed Boost
- The Dark Matter Of Internet Commerce - A Towering Pile of Scams - $1.4Bn And Counting...
- Groovy: Real-Time Data Could Aid Media Companies
- Tech Awards For Humanity: "Cash Prizes" Galore And Al Gore's Meaningless Speech . . . And Amazing Laureates!
- The Death Of The Search Algorithm? Techmeme Has Six Editors
- TEDxSF - Little TED Just Like The Big TED
- What's Next? Beyond Real-Time...
- PearlTrees: A Novel Approach To Human Mapping Of The Internet
Comments (1)
I've never been able to understand the contradiction of being smart and independent, and yet somehow completely (not just partially) smitten by the dreams and fantasies conjured up in branding. The latter appears to cancel the former. But I may be wrong.
Posted: November 3, 2009 10:55 PM