Delete The Hate: The Problem Is The Nasty Content Not The Anonymity
By Tom Foremski - August 14, 2009
There's been a fair amount of discussion of online anonymity lately. Paul Carr, a columnist at Telegraph.co.uk wrote that there is no place for anonymous comments on the Internet. ['Rascal! Your name!': Schopenhauer vs the Internet trolls]
I'm in no doubt that if we forced everyone who wanted to respond to a blog post or online article to use their real name, the Internet would be transformed.
Andrew Keen, also writing at Telegraph.co.uk, is also a supporter of banning anonymity and pseudonyms. [Punishing anonymity]
Not for the first (or last) time, I'm in 110% agreement with Carr. Anonymity is indeed killing our online culture and making it, in Carr's words, "a cesspool of trollery and abuse".
I disagree, there clearly is a place for anonymity on the Internet. Anonymity is one way people can express themselves or publish information that they might not be able to do under their own name.
Why ban anonymity and throw the baby out with the bath water if all you want to do is reduce the nasty comments? Just delete them, anonymous or not.
Yet this goes against one of the cardinal rules of Web 2.0, that users have control, that users have the right to be heard. Deleting comments or moderating comments is often considered a form of censorship and anti-free speech, and therefore it is wrong.
I disagree. This is not a free-speech or censorship issue. No one has the right to scrawl whatever garbage they want on my server. They can go out and get a free blogger account and publish as much as they want over there.
Newspapers don't publish every letter they receive why should it be otherwise for online publications?
« ChipWatch: Will The Industry Shift To 450mm? | Main | TrendWatch: One Ring To Bind Them All - The Quest And The Folly »
Posted to A Top Story | CultureWatch
August 14, 2009 | Permalink | Comment | Subscribe to SVW
- Top Stories:
- PearlTrees - A Way To Curate Your Web
- Disruptive Technologies Disrupt
- The Dead Horse Business Model...
- There's A TED Conference Near You... TEDxSF Is On April 27
- Were Google Hackers Amateurs Or Chinese Cyber Commandos?
- Farmville valued $1B More Than Twitter By The Smart Money
- The "Heinz 57" Media Business Model
- The Need To Teach Bootstrapping In Business Schools
- Criminal Penalties Coming For US Internet Companies That Don't Protect Human Rights Abroad
- Be Careful Of "Dark Territorial Atavism" When Making Changes To Your Web Site
- Intel Number 2 Suffers Stroke...
- Shakeup At Financial Times...
Comments (2)
There is definitely a place for anonymous. What about the person who has important information on a corrupt politician but fear persecution if their name gets out.
Posted: August 16, 2009 6:55 AM
thats a good point mat, but i think thats a special situation thats given in "real life" too. if you have a great story and fear problems, than you can anonymously contact the newspaper ... all most tom is right: "No one has the right to scrawl whatever garbage they want on my server. They can go out and get a free blogger account and publish as much as they want over there." i think so too.
Josy
Posted: August 23, 2009 5:10 AM