Green Technology Is Not Disruptive Says Silicon Valley Veteran Bill Coleman
By Tom Foremski - February 26, 2009
I recently met with Bill Coleman, one of Silicon Valley's most impressive entrepreneurs over the past 30 plus years. He's been at VisiCorp, Sun, he founded BEA Systems (sold to Oracle for $3.5bn), etc. His analysis of Silicon Valley's future is fascinating.
What was especially interesting about our conversation is that he doesn't see green/clean technologies as a disruptive technology. Yet Silicon Valley leads this nascent industry.
Mr Coleman says that green technology doesn't follow the Peter Drucker rule of being a disruptive technology, which means being 10 times better or cheaper than what was there before.
"In the green market, what we're displacing is cheaper per unit than what is displacing it. It won't be driven by a tsunami of adoption." He says companies and individuals will take their time before adopting more expensive green technologies, especially with the current economic condition.
However, this could change if President Obama's administration adopted a plan of offering incentives for the development and use of green technology. He says this would be a far better stimulus package.
"There are lots of benefits for humanity, but the economics of the green market won't drive a rapid adoption unless there are incentives."
Mr Coleman is a critic of the current government stimulus package, that focuses on physical infrastructure projects. He says that incentives for green technologies would create better quality jobs and have a longer term economic stimulus effect than pick and shovel jobs that end after the project is done. Green technology jobs have a longer life span than bridge or road projects.
Plus, infrastructure projects slow capital formation, he says, which is needed to fuel the next recovery.
Cloud computing, biotech, and nanotech are examples of Silicon Valley's best disruptive technologies, and they don't need any government incentives, says Mr Coleman. And these are industries where Silicon Valley leads.
The recession will hit hard, says Mr Coleman, but Silicon Valley will survive because it reinvents itself every ten years.
You can read the rest of the interview here:
February 26, 2009 | Permalink | Comment | Category: Thoughtleaders | Subscribe to SVW
- Top Stories:
- MediaWatch: More About Embargoes...
- MediaWatch: Mashable Is On A Tear - Continues To Widen Its Lead Over TechCrunch And Others
- Are There New Rules For Embargoes?
- Happy Birthday Dear Internet . . . The Internet Devalues Everything It Touches
- Our Local Schools Should Be Showcases Not Basket Cases - GOOG Ups Its Schools Focus
- Preparing For Spotify - Google Partners To Launch Music Service - Denies Competing With iTunes
- MediaWatch: An Example Of Data Journalism
- HP Facing First Ever Strike
- CPJ Announces Funding From Hedge Fund Manager Peter Thiel
- Smart Grid Innovation Competition Announced
- AT&T Technologies Showcase Includes "Telesole" Medicated Shoe Insoles
- CultureWatch: Should Cafes Become Cheap Office Spaces Or Places For Community Interaction?
Comments (3)
Hi Tom, I agree with Bill Coleman's comments about Green Technology.
In order to get wide sweeping adoption of alternative energy cars, for example, they need (among other things)to be a cheaper option for the consumer.
Companies like Shai Agassi's Better Place have recognised this and are talking at government level with many countries to bring about major incentives for battery-operated vehicles.
Posted: February 28, 2009 7:12 AM
Just to be fair, Coleman's statements about disruptive technologies succeeding without subsidies may be true for cloud computing, but it certainly isn't true for biotech and nanotech. Both industries were heavily supported by government dollars for at least 20 years before they gained any real market traction.
Subsidized support is a necessity for any new industry with high CAPEX costs and significant economies of scale.
As for the definition of disruptive, at least in energy, most green technologies will be 10x cheaper than fossil fuels if the full economic cost of use is considered.
Posted: March 20, 2009 12:42 PM
I agree. This is a very informative interview.
Good thoughts into what can really improve the economy in a longer term.
william gray
Posted: September 2, 2009 4:48 AM