Mark All PR Releases: "Not To Be Distributed by News Aggregators"

By Tom Foremski - October 22, 2007

Since Google News, Yahoo News, and other online news aggregators sometimes have trouble distinguishing news journalism from news releases from corporations or their surrogate PR firms, then the ethical thing to do is to mark all company releases: "Not to be distributed by News Aggregators."

It is the ethical thing to do. Because some people might mistake company releases, especially if they are in social media release format, as real news stories written by independent unbiased parties. Especially if they see those press releases on sites such as Google News, where they are mixed with legitimate news stories written by journalists from around the world.

Also, the company news release should clearly state at the top:"This content was prepared to promote the products or services of the following company or companies: [put company names here] and was created by: [PR firm or individual]."

Does anyone have any problems with that? It upholds transparency and it directly identifies the source of the content. It allows people to make their own judgement on the quality of the content.

Who'll be the first to send me a press release with those marks?

Or do you tell your clients how they can get their press release wide distribution through Google and Yahoo news? And charge them for it?

- - -

Please see: Why Social Media Releases are Moving in a Bad Direction - Questionable Ethics in Masquerading as "News"



Share this article

 Subscribe in a reader

By Tom Foremski - October 22, 2007 | Permalink | Comment | Category: New Rules Communications
| SVW Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW Mobile

Comments (1)

Thanks for your post Tom. I agree that there is a need for upholding ethical business practices, especially in an industry like PR where dissemination of information to the public is a central tenant of our job. That being said, I think putting labels across the press release takes it one step too far. We already have transparency with the byline. The source of the content should be clear. By putting "This content was prepared to promote the products or services of the following company or companies: [put company names here] and was created by: [PR firm or individual]," we are immediately cheapening the value of that release. I've posted more here: http://unspun.shiftcomm.com/


Post a comment