GOOG continues to gain in search engine ranks as MSFT, Ask and Time Warner slip
By Tom Foremski
ComScore Networks' latest analysis of search engine activity, for December 2006, showed Google gaining share - and at a faster pace than second-place Yahoo!
Google increased its lead by 0.4 share points to 47.4 percent of the total US market, compared with November 2006. Yahoo added 0.3 share points with 28.5 percent of the total. Microsoft sites were third with 10.5 percent, followed by Ask Network with 5.4 percent, and Time Warner with 4.9 percent.
Google and Yahoo's gains were at the expense of Microsoft, which lost 0.5 share points, Ask, which fell by 0.1 share points, and Time Warner which lost 0.2 share points.
ComScore assembles its data from monitoring the Internet activities of more than 2m consumers.
Foremski's Take: Google's lead shows no signs of flagging. Yahoo is doing a decent job in gaining share but not enough to catch Google. Google continues to grow much faster.
Third, fourth and fifth places in search rankings are all declining. Is there a place for these and specialized search engines on the Internet? Or is it that only the top two Internet businesses in each category have the best chances to succeed?
From ComScore Networks:
* Americans conducted 6.7 billion searches online in December, up 1 percent versus November. Annual growth rates in search query volume remained strong with a 30-percent increase since the same month a year ago.
For more information, please visit www.comscore.com.* Google Sites led the pack with 3.2 billion search queries performed, followed by Yahoo Sites (1.9 billion), MSN-Microsoft (713 million), Ask Network (363 million), and Time Warner Network (335 million).
powered by performancing firefox
New on SVW:
Talking about the business of technology
1.12.07: Bill would require webcasts, sat radio to use DRM
GOOG continues to gain in search engine ranks as MSFT, Ask and Time Warner slip
Obama announces - in online video
Twyla Tharp shows how to get Andy creative
GOOG continues to gain in search engine ranks as MSFT, Ask and Time Warner slip
January 16, 2007 |
Permalink | Comment on this post
| Tag:
View blog reactions | RSS Feed | SVW News Toolbar | SVW Newsletter
Trackback link for this entry:
http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1514
Comments
KC Chan-Herur on Vinod Khosla: How To Succeed In Silicon Valley By Bumbling And Failing...
On Vinod Khosla's "Freedom To Fail"—
That is the message every child need to know and internalize—as Vinod's and mine have because of the unique school they have attended. Same for every employee in our companies, if we are to transform and reinvent our economy. Example: Google, P&G and Zappo.
Bottom line—
Freedom To Fail = Freedom to Learn. Ignite curiosities, passions and innovations.
KC Chan-Herur
Twitter: kcInnovation
www.InnovationPassion.com
Mike on Case Study: Wells Fargo's Effective Brand Management . . . Not!
I have a wells fargo account I just opened. I deposited my payroll check thursday around 3 pm and it is FRIDAY 10 PM and NO MONEY!!! I gave them my whole check to deposit and over 24 hrs later, I am hungry, my stomach is growling. I am getting really depressed. I work hard and LIFE kicks my ASS around ALL DAY!!!
Life is not ROUGH, the DEVILS in it are though.
I wish I could buy something to eat!!!
Honestly, I cant wait till I die and my misery is gone.
Jason Lopez on Vinod Khosla Says Silicon Valley VCs Tried to Save Newspaper Industry In 1996
If Vinod was working with newspaper execs that early on, it would be really fascinating to know what their vision was. The newspaper business was in a crisis before the Internet arrived. There's a lengthy list of business dynamics that reared up in the 1980s and '90s like unions, the advertising paradigm, competition from cable TV, stiffer competition from local TV news, the renaissance of news/talk radio, and even the expansion of morning drive-time in metro areas (and the list could go on).
Alison van Diggelen on Vinod Khosla: How To Succeed In Silicon Valley By Bumbling And Failing...
Tom- enjoyed your post and video of Vinod. I also interviewed him for Fresh Dialogues at the Visionary Awards and he talked further about how he "muddles through and hopes to find the right answer." Also discussed the bubble in clean tech. He said, "Although this economic downturn is not good, it has helped slow down the bubble or pop it."
You can check out the interview and transcript at FreshDialogues http://tinyurl.com/mgau6q
cheers Aliso
Tom Foremski on A Saturday Post: The Internet Devalues Everything It Touches, Anything That Can Be Digitized
Chester: Thanks for the used books example. And yes, rarity is always valuable. And information about rarity can bring down the price of items, such as used books. De Beers approach is to control the rarity of diamonds, which are not as rare as you might think.
Chester White on A Saturday Post: The Internet Devalues Everything It Touches, Anything That Can Be Digitized
The Internet has drastically affected the used book business, too.
Used to be that you could search for years to find that one title you wanted; this happened to me many times. In the old days, some bookseller in Idaho might have had a book that a guy in South Africa desperately needed, but they couldn't find one another.
Now, if it's available from one of the thousands of bookdealers who put their inventory online, you can find it in 10 seconds.
As a result, t
Sharon Barclay on Socialbrite: Helping Non-Profits Master Social Tools For Social Change
What we really need in addition to services like SocialBrite is a Craig's List-type offering for non-profits. I know of many companies that would love to donate time, services, furniture, supplies, equipment, etc, but it's so hard to do effectively that it becomes too much hassle. You've said it before - there's a great opportunity for a technology company to develop and host this - matching the needs of the non-profits with the extra resources of corporations.
Dave Evans on Scobleizer Traffic Plunge - The Real-Time Web Can Be Bad For Your Blog
Agree about the fragmenting, we'll all be using something different next year anyway, no sense worrying about who's using what and how much, we're all out there on the edge trying things out and experimenting. I doubt we'll be using Twitter or FriendFeed in two years anyway.
I'm remain a huge fan of Techmeme (my home page which alternates with feedly and a few others). I do wish they would roll out different channels though.
Tom Foremski on Scobleizer Traffic Plunge - The Real-Time Web Can Be Bad For Your Blog
Robert, thanks for the clarification.
I love the fact that things keep on changing in the this shattered/fragmented media landscape of today. And I don't think they will ever stop changing.
That makes it challenging for both media and PR to tell their stories. Or rather, to get attention for their stories and the subsequent conversations.
Robert Scoble on Scobleizer Traffic Plunge - The Real-Time Web Can Be Bad For Your Blog
Tom: I disagree with your thesis. I specifically made the choice to blog less to focus on Twitter and FriendFeed and I see that that investment has paid off very well for me.
Yes, my blog traffic has gone way down, but my FriendFeed posts are now being found all over the place in Google and are going up and I'm the #1 most followed person there.
On Twitter I still am in the top 10 in terms of organically gained followers, which is quite impressive.
Now I have a distri
Doug Millison on Scobleizer Traffic Plunge - The Real-Time Web Can Be Bad For Your Blog
Didn't he use all those tweets to drive traffic to his blog by linking to media & posts there? If not, why not? Seems to me it could be both/and instead of either/or. Work backwards from good blog posts, highlight them in tweets + link back to blog.
Steve "PodcastSteve" Lubetkin on The Pressure Is On When Every Company Is Now A Media Company...
Tom, great post. We've been pointing out the value of content creation when we speak to audiences of marketers and PR people. The reality of reduced staffing at many local media outlets means more opportunities to generate content for clients.
Press conferences that go uncovered by the media can be vidcast via websites; photos of events can be shared with interested audiences, and of course, powerfully influential blog sites like SVW rise up on the radar of publicists trying to get th
Tom Foremski on Scobleizer Traffic Plunge - The Real-Time Web Can Be Bad For Your Blog
Louis: Thanks for speaking for Robert, I know that you know him well. I used to sit next to Robert at Podtech and I would often say to him, I don't know how you do it because he was able to do it all, and do it all the time. But even an online athlete such as Robert needs to decide where his time produces the most value. It's clear that the real-time web is currently a less valuable use of time than publishing on well established web sites such as his own. That might change. You clearly need
Louis Gray on Scobleizer Traffic Plunge - The Real-Time Web Can Be Bad For Your Blog
Robert hasn't ditched Twitter and FriendFeed in a New York second. He's taking a one week hiatus from both, just like he has taken hiatuses from his blog on previous occasions.
He may have quickly written how he "was addicted" to both and made it sound past tense, but all he has done is moved his current attention to one focus of activity, rather than broadly covering all pieces.
Even today, when he said he was "off FriendFeed", he made a comment on his own posts. So this is t
Tom Foremski on Scobleizer Traffic Plunge - The Real-Time Web Can Be Bad For Your Blog
Louis, you are right, Robert's traffic on the real-time web increased substantially. But it's ephemeral, it doesn't provide the same value as his blog traffic because it doesn't exist within Google in the same way web site content exists, it's not as searchable, as Robert points out. And the loss of that traffic does indeed show a loss of "thought leadership" as others have pointed out. At the moment, one set of traffic numbers related to the real-time web does not equate with "static" web tr
Tom Foremski on Saturday Post: If You Are In The Path Of A Disruptive Technology You Are Toast - Goodbye Newspaper Companies
Jason: I totally agree. The demand for high quality news reporting isn't going away, in fact, it will increase, as we have less of it. It might very well come from the same people that produce it today but not from the same companies. It's the companies and their business models that are being disrupted. News reporting and journalism will survive and prosper.
Jason Lopez on Saturday Post: If You Are In The Path Of A Disruptive Technology You Are Toast - Goodbye Newspaper Companies
I'm not so sure the news is becoming irrelevant. It seems more like paper is. Tom, you are a professional so you know that, as a few prominent bloggers want to believe, there are no high priests of media who sanction the news we will all consume. There are some wacky editors for sure, but the downfall of newspapers isn't because they chose to not cover stories. You rightly point out the toppling of the classified ad model. A newspaper, as currently published, must have wide distribution for c
Louis Gray on Scobleizer Traffic Plunge - The Real-Time Web Can Be Bad For Your Blog
This single data point is correct - Scoble's traffic has decreased.
But, if you consider that he has blogged less than half as often as he did previously, you could argue that each story got more views. And what is his goal anyway? If his goal is to gain visibility and participate as the Web evolves, then the best places to do that are on the blog, on Facebook, Twitter and FriendFeed. And nobody does that better than Scoble, myself included.
If this is the only metric you can
Lawrence Greenberg on The Pressure Is On When Every Company Is Now A Media Company...
This is an excellent post.
I launched a blog on my site just a few weeks ago and am already appreciating the challenge involved in providing meaningful content according to a regular editorial calendar.
The fact that these platforms require little or no monetary investment suggests that publishing online is a cinch. Far from it. It represents a significant investment of time, thought and care.
As a communications professional, it's vital that I engage with others in
Michele Weldon on Saturday Post: If You Are In The Path Of A Disruptive Technology You Are Toast - Goodbye Newspaper Companies
You're right, but I am not full frontal negative. The good journalism will survive. The technology alters and disrupts the delivery mode, but not the need for the content. Call me delusional, but I think the audience will seek the solid, quality journalism wherever it arrives.
I commented on my blog about it:
http://micheleweldon.wordpress.com/2009/06/29/change-sure-extinction-no/