« November 2006 | Main | January 2007 »
December 2006 Archives
December 31, 2006
12.31.06: Free Culture Foundation
Received this press release this morning:
The Free Culture Foundation was launched today to promote and protect cultural freedoms. The Foundation provides an accessible, independent introduction to the free culture movement, now a global phenomenon thanks to the Creative Commons licenses, organisations like Open Business and artists like the Beastie Boys.
The Foundation defines 'free culture' in terms of four simple principles: the freedom to use, create, share and learn. In recognition of the controversy surrounding the Creative Commons licenses (apparently they have been criticized by the media industry for tricking artists into giving away their rights and the free software community has criticized them for allowing limitations on re-use), the Foundation's new web site presents a set of essays that discuss precisely what these might mean. Future plans include packaging free art for free software users and commissioning a set of essays to explain the issues.
Rob Myers, digital artist, said "we fill a gap left by the likes of Creative Commons, popularising a coherent set of principles. We don't pretend to have all the answers, but want people to think more about how technology and the law help or hinder our ability to watch films, write novels, share music with friends and learn to paint."
December 31, 2006 |
Permalink | Comment on this post
| Tag: News Watch
View blog reactions | RSS Feed | Subscribe to daily SVW Newsletter!
December 22, 2006
12.22.06: Screen shots from P2P TV Venice Project
Om has screen shots from the still pre-beta Venice Project, a P2P TV start-up created by Skype founders Niklas Zennstrom and Janus Friis.
In an interview with Om in October, Friis explained:
Television is the most powerful mass medium, and we are trying to do is marry the best of television with the best of internet. What people love about the television is the story telling. What people don’t like is television that is locked in linear time. We want to try and preserve the best bits of television, and discard bits people don’t care for.
People like the freedom of choice and like freedom from choice. For example, channels are good, because they define the content. Today, the channels are locked in legacy infrastructure, but on broadband the channels are not locked in time.
That’s what the Venice Project is doing. What we have done is created a streaming P2P platform for television. This is a platform, which is good for content owners, for advertisers and of course the viewers. Since there are no borders on the Internet, this is a global platform. Sometimes we think content owners have legal reasons to restrict content locally and the technology allows them to do that.
It's hard to tell about the quality based on the screen shots. We'll take Om's word for it:
The visuals on a Lenovo T60 with a 15.2-inch screen were stunning and crisp. The streams came through without a problem and there was very little jitter. Still, no point hooking it up to a big screen TV… just yet! There isn’t LIVE TV content on the service right now and most of what is there consists of meager offerings streaming off the Venice Project servers. So you can’t truly judge how good this service will be when it comes to “live” broadcasts just yet.
But, Om points out there is a content problem.
Unlike Skype which had “forced viral distribution” built into its business model, this one needs content… a lot of quality content. Large media companies, globally, would like to get their pound of flesh from the Venice Project (now that the Skype boys are all rich, they can pay right!). The technology certainly works, and for content providers - say the Disney and Viacoms of the world - this is a pretty good thing. It frees them up from the carriage providers and gives them a global audience.
So is this a YouTube-killer, as Gizmodo's Jason Chen has it?
Do people care how the data is getting from the host to them? No. That's exactly why peer to peer will definitely win over a centralized, YouTube approach. By cutting down on bandwidth costs (they're mostly from the users), the Venice Project can have much higher quality video. Just like with Skype, what do people care that their call or video is going through Zimbabwe before getting to them? The only thing that's important is that the quality is there, and the content is there. All that the Venice Project needs now is content.
December 22, 2006 |
Permalink | Comment on this post
| Tag: Video Watch
View blog reactions | RSS Feed | Subscribe to daily SVW Newsletter!
British Queen plans Xmas Podcast
I'm enjoying being in London and it is interesting that blogging and the whole "citizen media" movement is largely absent from daily discussions. But that's not surprising since culture moves slowly.
Podcasting, however, is much more popular, and has been enthusiastically adopted by large institutions such as the BBC, and now, the Royal Family.
The Queen, 80 years old, is planning to release a podcast of her Xmas speech. The Queen's speech is very much a core traditional element of the British Xmas experience, delivered mid-afternoon on Christmas day.
The podcast was the Queen's idea, as is the content of her speech. This year the theme will be nurturing the young, and respect for the elderly.
December 22, 2006 |
Permalink | Comment on this post
| Tag: Pod Watch
View blog reactions | RSS Feed | Subscribe to daily SVW Newsletter!
Can dotMobi break the stranglehold of the wireless Telcos?
Accessing the Internet from cell phones is possible but the experience is poor. Mobile web browser performance is clunky, few web sites are designed for cell phone access, and the customer bill can be astronomical.
I recently spoke with Alexa Raad, who heads up marketing and business development at dotMobi, a startup whose mission is to make the mobile Internet an everyday reality instead of an expensive curiosity. A key part of its strategy is establishing the domain name extension .mobi to designate web sites that support mobile browsers.
But why should businesses buy a .mobi extension when their web servers already detect the type of browser and can be set up to automatically serve up a mobile version of a web page?
"The extension tells users that the web site supports mobile browsers and conforms to standards that guarantee a fast download and probably has low access costs," says Ms Raad. "Some web pages can cost users as much as $10 to download because they aren't designed for mobile devices or the developers aren't aware of the costs."
The operators of .mobi web sites agree to abide by three mandatory rules: no use of frames on the web sites because these are difficult to render by mobile web browsers; no use of the www prefix in the name of the web site; use of XML in creating web sites. If these rules aren't met, dotMobi has the right to revoke the use of the .mobi extension.
These are very easy conditions to meet, and most regular web sites would already be compliant anyway, because these are best practices for any kind of site. This doesn't mean they would be mobile-friendly.
To produce web sites that load fast on mobile devices, and won't cost users a fortune in data costs, takes much more effort. That's why dotMobi has created free development packages and support forums for developers to cut the cost of creating .mobi sites. Tools include ways to calculate the cost of downloading a web page depending upon the data package of the wireless carrier.
The company is funded by Nokia, Microsoft, Vodafone and other strategic investors. The money is used to create the development tools, plus there is revenue from registering .mobi and common extensions.
"We want to make sure that the user experience with .mobi sites is good. We don't want a few bad apples spoiling the neighborhood, that's why we will cancel registrations if web site owners don't abide by mandatory rules," says Ms Raad.
But the biggest obstacle to the realization of dotMobi's mission are the wireless carriers. They have stuck customers with hundreds of dollars in charges because of complex Internet data packages. Combined with the poor performance of mobile browsers, many early users of the mobile Internet have already been turned off from the experience.
Ms Raad is very much aware of this issue, but hopes that the wireless carriers will come up with inexpensive Internet access packages. "Europe is much further ahead in this area than we are in the US, so I'm hoping that things will change," she says. She adds that wireless carriers are among investors in dotMobi.
Foremski's Take: The wireless carriers aren't going to give up their lucrative gateway position. They make a fortune standing between the mobile Internet and the consumer.
Even if tens of thousands of high quality .mobi web sites spring up, that won't mean much because the wireless carriers can easily substitute their online services, or those of partners.
They won't need to block .mobi sites but they can make them a click or three further away. And on the cramped user interface of mobile devices, that's like sending .mobi sites to Siberia.
There are also other obstacles created by the wireless carriers. A senior executive from a startup mobile search firm told me that video services from major wireless carriers hog much of available wireless data bandwidth, cutting off even the partners of wireless carriers.
The promises of the mobile Internet, at least in the US, won't arrive until there are ways of getting around the wireless carriers. Technologies such as WiMAX, which offers high speed wireless data across large distances, could get around the gateway stranglehold.
Intel (an SVW sponsor) is working on making WiMAX capabilities standard in notebook computers, and others are working on the WiMAX infrastructure. But it will be several years before WiMAX based services are widely available.
In short, the mobile Internet will be a long time coming, blocked by the greed of wireless carriers. These companies are rapidly becoming the largest obstacle to technological progress and the development of Internet economies, IMHO.
- - -
Please also see:
Intel Breakthrough Demonstrates Its First Mobile WiMAX Baseband Chip
An excerpt from the dotMobi Blog: dotMobi
...some of the more recent smart phones (e.g. the Nokia N90 and N70 series) are being shipped with the Web Kit browser that can render normal desktop sites such as Amazon without any problems. However, there are 4 major problems with this approach:
- These advanced phones represent a tiny percentage of the phones in use around the world. We should concern ourselves more with the ~2.5 billion other “normal” phones. Yes, these advanced abilities will likely trickle down to other phones, but this will take a long time.
- Phones will always be less capable than PCs due to the physical size limitations. You simply can’t fit a big screen and keyboard in a small phone. There will always be a capabilities gap, regardless of how good the phones get.
- Just because you can visit a PC site on a phone, it doesn’t mean you necessarily want to. Mobile is different. Mobile browsing is much less about random surfing than it is about targeted, time & location-specific tasks. Experience has shown that you can’t simply miniaturize a site for mobile—to be truly mobile-friendly and useful, a site needs to be designed for mobile, not just squeezed into a smaller space. Some people argue that mobile should be considered another channel entirely, and that it is a mistake to think about it in the same way.
- Viewing a PC site on a phone can be very expensive because of all the graphics that need to be downloaded. The cost issue alone is enough to make this unfeasible for many users. Example: the cnn.com homepage would cost as much as €7 to view on a phone based on some data plans in Europe.
Link to: dotMobi Mobile browser advances do not remove the the need for mobile-friendly sites
December 22, 2006 |
Permalink | Comment on this post
| Tag: dotMobi
View blog reactions | RSS Feed | Subscribe to daily SVW Newsletter!
December 21, 2006
12.21.06: Juniper takes $900m hit, IBM nixes options for directors
The stock options tornado keeps on blowing through the Valley and the rest of corporate America, as Reuters reports here
- IBM will stop providing stock option grants to its board of directors. Directors will get a raise in cash compensation from $100K to $200K.
- Juniper Networks will take a $900 million hit for stock options granted from 1999 to 2003. The charge stems from two grants made to CEO Scott Kriens. Juniper will file its Q2 and Q3 statements in Q1 of 2007. Red Herring offers Kriens' apology:
“As the leader of this company, I would like to express our regret, to everyone who relies on Juniper, for the difficulties this situation has caused for us all,” said Mr. Kriens in a statement.
“In prior years, we should have had better stock option granting processes, controls, and oversight in place, and we did not,” he added. “While we cannot undo the past, we will focus going forward on the filing of our financial statements, further improving the robustness of the company’s stock option-granting procedures, the ongoing cooperation with government agencies, and the continued execution of our business strategy.”
December 21, 2006 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Tag: News Watch
View blog reactions | RSS Feed | Subscribe to daily SVW Newsletter!12.21.06: Google updates Blogger
By Richard Koman for SiliconValleyWatcher "Hey now that Time says that bloggers are the person of the year maybe we at Google should have some whizzy blog software. Hey! What's this with mold and hair all over it?! It says "Blogger." Maybe we can gussy this old thing up."
Yes, after about, what, six or seven years, Google is rolling out a new version of the original blog software, which they've left starving in a forgotten closet for most of these many Web 2.0 years.
InfoWorld reports that the new version will feature user-definable templates, tagging of posts, multiple authors, and faster publication of new posts.
On the Blogger homepage, Google gushes over the new version:
The new version of Blogger is metaphorically bursting with features, from the big guns like drag-and-drop template editing and post labels (which are perfect, by the way, for indexing the 131 historical figures you may have written about), to little polishes like a better-designed Dashboard or that you no longer need to solve a word verification CAPTCHA to post a comment on your own blog.We’re excited about the new version of Blogger, both for what it can do now (which also includes access control for blogs and better input fields for post dates) and what we’ll add to it in the future, now that we have a new, stable, powerful infrastructure to work with. We’re done with “beta,” but we’re far from done with the new Blogger.
December 21, 2006 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Tag: News Watch
View blog reactions | RSS Feed | Subscribe to daily SVW Newsletter!12.21.06: Labels sue AllofMP3.com in US court
US record companies filed suit in New York against Allofmp3.com, the Russian website that sells copyrighted recordings for a fraction of the price charged by legitimate vendors. The Russian company says it's legit because it pays royalties to the Russian Multimedia and Internet Society, reports Out-Law.com for the Register.
"Defendant's entire business amounts to nothing more than a massive infringement of plaintiffs' exclusive rights under the Copyright Act and New York law," says the law suit.
Unlike US and British royalty collecting agencies, the Russian version pays no royalties to artists or record labels. Yet the Russian Multimedia and Internet Society ROMS itself says the site is legal because it licenses it.
"Allofmp3.com's activity is quite legitimate," ROMS general director Oleg Nezus told BBC Russia earlier this year. "The opinion of foreign copyright owners is just that - their opinion."
December 21, 2006 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Tag: News Watch
View blog reactions | RSS Feed | Subscribe to daily SVW Newsletter!December 20, 2006
12.20.06: Ericsson buys Redback for $2.1bn
By Richard Koman for SiliconValleyWatcher Ericsson is buying "edge" router maker Redback for $2.1 billion. Not exactly a household name, Redback's technology is seen as key to supporting the growth of Internet video, AP says.
"It's a huge market for the routing technology necessary to build out these networks, and it's really video driving the need for the infrastructure changes," he said in an interview. "I don't view this as an ending, I view it as a perfect match of the key technologies that will be necessary in the future."
Om offers a litte history on the company:
Those of you too young to buy your own drinks may not know Redback, but is was once as highflying as say, Facebook. It was a company which made uber-VCs like Norwest Capital Partners, Telesoft and Kleiner Perkins Caufield Byers a lot of money… and I mean a lot of money. But that was back in the day2, the late 1990s. But then the bubble popped, and everyone assumed Redback would deflate along with it.
But they didn’t! The broadband boom happened, and suddenly everyone wanted to get a piece of Redback’s multi-service edge routing technology. That’s a fancy way of saying it makes boxes that allow phone companies sell DSL, broadband, telephone, TV and other services over the local loop. In 2005, sales were up 33 percent, and in first nine months of 2006, sales went up another 87 percent to about $197 million.
Ericsson is paying $25 for a share of Redback, an 18% premium on their recent closing price (and Om notes, a 60% premium on their 90-day moving average). That's seen as definitely on the high end but not in the stratosphere.
"The price reflects the future," Ericsson Chief Executive Carl-Henric Svanberg told Reuters. "Redback does not have anything unique which we would not be able to develop on our own over two to three years, but now we get to the market faster and our offering becomes more complete."
But Reuters offers some other benchmarks that show just how steep the price is.
The deal values Redback at 39 times projected 2007 earnings per share before items, according to Reuters Estimates. Rival Juniper trades at 22 times projected 2007 per share profits per share before items.
The deal is one more in a series of consolidations in the network industry. News.com relates:
French equipment maker Alcatel and United States-based Lucent Technologies closed their deal last month. German telecommunications equipment maker Siemens and Nokia are planning to merge parts of their businesses early next year to compete. Last year, Ericsson also bought Marconi, a maker of IP-networking gear for about $2 billion.
December 20, 2006 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Tag: News Watch
View blog reactions | RSS Feed | Subscribe to daily SVW Newsletter!Link in to SVW on LinkedIn
By Tom Foremski for Silicon Valley Watcher LinkedIn, the business networking site, has been coming up on my radar screen quite a bit recently, and I like what I'm seeing.
It has taken a while for this site to become useful and interesting because it needed to have a large enough user base. It's a chicken and egg type situation that many other social networking sites face.
I like the way LinkedIn has added features that update members on things such as changes in jobs among contacts, etc.
I'd like to offer my readers, an opportunity to link to me on LinkedIn. Send me an invitation (tom at SiliconValleyWatcher.com) and I promise to accept--especially if you are subscriber to SVW's Rooster newsletter (free!) and/or are an SVW news toolbar user.
BTW, we're adding more features to the toolbar which will include a special alert feature notifying users of new posts and breaking news. The alert feature will be made two-way so that SVW readers will be able to let us know about breaking news in their sectors.
Please note if you are in the PR community and pitch SVW: I get tons of pitches from PR companies and it is very difficult for me to keep up with them all, so I'm going to prioritize my attention.
If you are an SVW newsletter subscriber I promise to look at your pitches first.
SVW Rooster newsletter signups - find out which way the wind blows in Silicon Valley!
And/or:
SVW's Silicon Valley News toolbarDecember 13, 2006 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Tag: Rooster
View blog reactions | RSS Feed | Subscribe to daily SVW Newsletter!12.13.06: Epicenter of Web 2.0 boom: 625 Second
By Richard Koman for SiliconValleyWatcher The boom is back in SoMa, the Journal's Pui-Wing Tam wrote yesterday, and the epicenter is 625 Second St. in the heart of the old dot-com streets.
On a recent Friday, one new tenant on the third floor, online software firm BuzzLogic was meeting with a venture capitalist. Nearby, Jill Gilbert, CEO of a start-up that compiles online and printed retirement home guides, held a yoga class with five employees. ... One start-up, LicketyShip, a same-day delivery service, has a punching bag by its cubicles and a place for people to sleep in the building if they're too busy to go home ...
Ummm ....
The master tenant of sorts on the third floor is LookSmart, which took a 10-year lease on the space in 1999 and whose stock hit $350 in early 2000. In 2001, the stock price was $2 but that was the time to buy as its now more than doubled to $5. With all that space and so few employees, LookSmart CEO John Simonelli decided to sublease to startups.
I know it sounds bubble-ish, but we thought, why not have a space to help incubate new companies?
Bubble-ish? Yeah. Despite the protestations of an employee at SpotDJ that "companies have pretty sane business ideas," the companies at 625 have disturbingly familiar wing-and-a-prayer business plans:
Online video editing and sharing outfit Cuts Inc says the company will earn revenue from Internet advertising on its Web site. Cuts' neighbor, start-up SpotDJ, whose software lets consumers pretend to be DJs, also says it plans to make money from ads. Ditto the Helium Report, which provides online guides for luxury destinations and products.
Time to open a hot new restaurant around the corner? Well, maybe not.
December 13, 2006 | Permalink | Comment on this post | Tag: News Watch
View blog reactions | RSS Feed | Subscribe to daily SVW Newsletter!In media, the medium defines the DRM
By Tom Foremski for Silicon Valley Watcher I was over at CNET on Tuesday being interviewed on video, about mobile video. I spoke about the trends, digital rights management (DRM), the role of wireless carriers, media producers, and content owners.
DRM is pivotal in the digital media world, it protects content. Whoever owns the dominant DRM will rule the world because DRM is the gatekeeper, it protects and collects. It protects the content and it is how the content is monetised, transformed into individually targeted media services.
Because of the strategic importance of the DRM, lots of companies want to own it. Yet no content owner wants one company to establish a dominant DRM because they could lose substantial controls.
That's why we face a future DRM hell as these things battle themselves to a conclusion, imho.
After the interview, I started thinking about our old analog media technologies, and their marvelously effective DRM features, all built into the physics of the medium. Analog protected against piracy and enabled profitable media business models--a perfect DRM. In media, the medium defines the DRM.
Consider conventional TV broadcast signals. Analog TV technology could be described as a very effective streaming video technology. It transmits massive amounts of video information through hundreds of channels simultaneously and wirelessly.
Each analog TV channel represents a wireless broadband system that can support any number of users, from ten to ten million--with no loss of performance from increased user load.
Analog TV has a broadcast range of more than a hundred miles. Try doing that with digital distribution technologies such as cellular networks, or WiMAX, all of which seem t