HP Hearings: Barton focuses on Sonsini, others point to violation of public trust

By Richard Koman - September 28, 2006

Rep. Joe Barton points out that Larry Sonsini signed off on the pretexting ops back in April, and demands to know how he didn't wave a red flag, rather than saying "such operations are not generally illegal." He and other reps have asked, why are so many principles refusing to testify today if the actions were so legal?

A common thread in the opening statements is that the public will expect HP's actions are common throughout the Valley and the whole corporate world and that public will fear that their own private records may be searched. "Is corporate America the next big brother, Rep. Tammy Baldwin said in her opening statements.

Most members of the subcommittee are pointing to an anti-pretexting bill the committee reported out this summer, which died in a "black hole" on the Hill. lt's pretty obvious that another bill will be passed and that House leadership will be hard-pressed to sit on it after all this.

Share this article

 Subscribe in a reader

By Richard Koman - September 28, 2006 | Permalink | Comment | Category: HP [HPQ]
| SVW Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW Mobile

Comments (1)

Tom, As my blog discussed last week, there is a New Corporate Paranoia in America today and it tracks back to Regulation FD and Sarbanes-Oxley. Congress is smart (hey, it happens) to ask how widespread these preactices are. As giant corporations go, HP is among the more benign. Some other companies' practices make Guantanamo Bay look like Disneyworld.


Post a comment