Welcome to the Conversation Age! All conversations may be monitored...

By Tom Foremski - March 7, 2006

By Tom Foremski for SiliconValleyWatcher

(From my ZDNet blog post: Nakedness, overload and other maladies of the Conversation Age .)

hands-bloody.jpg

Conversations are good, they are good for your company's bottom-line if you become involved in those conversations. And monitoring the conversations in the blogosphere and selling the results to corporations, as companies such as Technorati do, is a great way to figure out who is bad-mouthing your company and also, it is the cheapest and most effective market research you can buy.


The involvement of many tens of millions of people in the blogosphere, all involved in online group discussions from just a couple of people, to many tens of thousands--is a marketers' gold mine. All those conversations that might have happened over the garden fence, or in the cafe, are now public and searchable.


And Technorati and many others, will analyze the links, the authority of a site, and report to their corporate customers on the "conversations" around a product, service, company or individual.


This is not a bad thing if it leads to highly hyper-personalised marketing. That way, I would be targeted with what I needed--say new shoes. And I would be subject to fewer advertisements littering my psyche.


But this will never happen. Fewer adverts because of better targeting would be a false promise, it is like the promise of the paperless office, or the Leisure Society from labor-saving devices. So therefore, naked conversations are a bad thing--(let's go semi-private pronto).


Conversations have become a big feature of this Internet 2.0 and it is not surprising because to me, the internet is a media technology. And now with Internet 2.0 we have an asynchronous media technology: we can publish outwards--and we can collect and publish inwards the comments of others.

Is  blogging a conversation? Of sorts; it enables people to comment and discuss a blog post. But the conversation is often clumsy and short.

What blogging enables you to do, is to handle mass conversations--one person to have a "conversation" with many tens of thousands of people.

Blogging is a lot like sending out a family newsletter with a paid-reply card. We all hate the family newsletter but in the blogosphere it is okay because I can have an experience of a  conversation with a top blogger such as Robert Scoble. Or rather, a short stilted conversation, since bloggers have become masters of minimalist conversations :-).

Conversations about conversations leads me to think of this Internet 2.0 age as the Conversation Age.

This is different from the Information Age--which is associated with Internet 1.0 and our ability, through the web browser, to publish a page to any screen attached to any computer.

The Information Age led to one of the early maladies of the digital age--Information Overload. This is familiar to all--it is that mild-to-extreme feeling of paranoia that we haven't kept up with our reading/surfing.

In the Conversation Age we will suffer from Conversation Overload. This will become familiar to all, it's the mild-to-extreme feeling of paranoia that we haven't kept up with our email, blogging, IM, SMS, and voicemail, etc.

I think that Conversation Overload is a worse malady than Information Overload. Because I can walk away from reading Business Week this week, more easily than I can walk away from a conversation through blogging, email, etc. Those conversations are all important to me, yet I can't keep up with them.

Conversation Overload is tough because we don't want it to seem as if we are ignoring someone but there is not enough time in the world to keep up with all the conversations.

That's why I spend a chunk of my day in a conversation blackout zone so that I can think, write, and so that I can hear my own conversation with myself. And I want to have a chance to have a conversation with my kids.

After I've done that, then I try and keep up with my online and offline conversations, comments, emails, voicemail, etc--and I'm sometimes unable to keep up with them all. But what can you do?

Well one thing that  I do, which works very well, is that I only give out my cell phone number and I make it clear that it is my cell phone number. If something is important--don't send me five emails--call me! It works great--I get the conversations that really matter.

My Conversations, in order of importance, preference and attention:  

  • face-to-face
  • cell phone
  • SMS
  • IM
  • blog comments
  • email
  • trackbacks
  • landline phone
  • fax

What about you?

- - -

- - -

                       Share with Bit.ly                    

March 7, 2006 | Permalink | Comment | Category: Culture Watch | Subscribe to SVW

Comments (4)

Amy Gahran:

You're right, Tom, conversation overload is the inevitable plague of conversational media -- and it's more difficult to extricate yourself from it.

Personally, I find e-mail conversations to be more of a time-sink than blogging, because there's more of an expectation of response with e-mail. Which means, of course, guilt if you don't respond.

I find with public or group conversations (blogs, e-mail lists, and other tools) I experience less of a sense of overload because I feel less obligation to keep up with it or to respond.

I'm trying, these days, to limit my e-mail time to checking it 3 times a day. Honestly, I haven't been completely successful with that.

Online chat can be a time sink, but I only do that with the people I'm close to and they all know that if I'm busy I won't say much. So I feel that's something I can control and it doesn't have much of a sense of obligation. And to me, it's less distracting than a phone call.

I'm glad you raised this theme. I'll consider it further.

- Amy Gahran
RightConversation.com
Contentious.com

Posted: March 9, 2006 9:00 AM

Amy Gahran:

OK, you got my gears going, Tom. I posted about this conversation overload theme over at my blog, The Right Conversation.

See: "Conversation overload: How do you cope?"

Enjoy,

- Amy Gahran
RightConversation.com
Contentious.com

Posted: March 9, 2006 9:41 AM

Tom Foremski - Silicon Valley Watcher [TypeKey Profile Page]:

Thanks Amy! Yes, you are right about email, that's the one I have the most trouble with because most of my email requires a response from me and takes several hours to process, so I usually put it off until I have done my work for the day--my interviews, written up a story or two, spoken with my kids, etc. But by then it can be very late (or early) and I head for bed and then I fall behind, and then I am days behind, then I just want to dynamite my inbox so that I can start again... :-)

Posted: March 9, 2006 6:05 PM

chris newlan:

Tom
You have hit the nail on the head. I have just posted the below on my blog.
"Technology has spawned a reluctance to communicate in the most effective way possible - face to face. A recent IABC survey for CW found that 27 major US corporations communicate bad news to their staff via email. Astonishing! My own experiences back this up with managers in large organisations I've worked with or for adopt the easy path by "de-personalising" communications. Technology is a fantastic tool to maximise the way you communicate. However it should never be used in isolation. Some effective communication performance measures would be a good start and I''ll revisit this issue in an upcoming post."

Posted: March 13, 2006 2:39 AM

Post a comment


tibco software
Silicon Valley Watcher Shop

Choose some images and the
products choose you!

Tom Foremski #28 on San Francisco - Silicon Valley Top 50 Most Influential
PR Week: Tom Foremski - top journalists you should know!
Bacon's names Silicon Valley Watcher one of the most influential blogs in the US.
In CNET's Top 100
blog100 149x46.jpg
Best Bay Area Blog
SF Publicity Club's ninth annual awards celebrating excellence in media.