The sky is falling says NYT media beat reporter
By Tom Foremski - February 13, 2006
This is directly related to what I've been asking for the last five months: what happens if the old media dies before the new media learns to walk?
Hat tip to Romenesko:
NYT's Carr says he's glad he stayed on the media beat City (of Rochester) David Carr, who has written about the media for Washington City Paper, Twin Cities Reader and Inside.com, says he almost passed on the chance to be New York Times' media columnist. "Although I was reluctant at first, because I thought I was pretty much done with media, I eventually came around," he says. "And I'm glad I did, because the sky actually is falling right now, and it's fun and interesting and scary all at the same time to watch the ways in which media are atomizing and becoming commoditized."
http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=45&aid=96626
« Scoop! Intel awards massive marketing/PR contracts as it seeks to reinvent its image under new CEO | Main | A conversation about trust with with Richard Edelman »
February 13, 2006 | Permalink | Comment | Category: MediaWatch | Subscribe to SVW
- Top Stories:
- Tech Awards For Benefiting Humanity
- The Death Of The Search Algorithm? Techmeme Has Six Editors
- TEDxSF - Little TED Just Like The Big TED
- SNCR Research: Social Media IS Influencing Business Decisions
- What's Next? Beyond Real-Time...
- PearlTrees: A Novel Approach To Human Mapping Of The Internet
- MediaWatch Analysis Part II: Google Has More To Lose Than Murdoch
- MediaWatch Analysis: Murdoch Will Negotiate Payment For Access To Basket Of Content With GOOG et al
- WeekendWatcher: The Sheer Number Of Things Will Devalue Them
- ChipWatch - Where Will The Next Generation Of Engineers Come From?
- Public Healthcare Could Cut Startup Costs And Help Spur Innovation
- Is GOOG's $750m AdMob Buy Strategic Or Dumb? An alternate view...
Comments (1)
Yes...this is the central problem, in particular, of the newspaper industry, with its huge investments in infrastructure that will ultimately obsolete. Lots of revenue to replace and the trajectory of online revenues is simply not sufficient at this point to replace it. It's a real dilemma and I am rooting for newspapers to find the magic formula before it's too late.
(It's also why your comparison of the PR industry to the newspaper industry was flawed. PR has not infrastructure; just big mouths.)
Posted: February 18, 2006 4:40 PM