iTunes goes to Hollywood
By - May 31, 2005
With iTunes 4.8, Apple has quietly added video clip support. Now, any QuickTime movie can be dragged into a playlist in iTunes. This allows easy download, sorting and playback of digital video clips.
But the challenge for Apple is not getting content from the studios, or protecting it, or the technical details of distributing it. Rather, the challenge is to convert iPod and iTunes listeners into viewers.
This also begs the question: How quickly will iTunes replace NetFlix?
It should be obvious to anyone following the progress of downloadable video that the holdups are political and economic, not technical. It has taken a long time to make Hollywood comfortable with digital rights management for downloadable content - and it has been even harder to get consumers to pay for $4 movie downloads over pathetic US "broadband." Services such as CinemaNow have been providing downloadable movies for years, but they have not achieved mainstream penetration. In fact, they seem to be no more than elaborate proofs of concept for DRM technology.
The de facto standard approaches to video distribution, which reportedly make up some 50% of Internet bandwidth use, are of course the ubiquitous file-sharing networks. The current business model for these networks is a non-sustainable "sell ads and run from lawsuits while you can."
So what's in store for iTunes? A natural first step is music videos. These are essentially promotional content, short, small in size, and of relatively low value to the labels, but nonetheless a perfect discrete digital "goodie" that consumers are eager to download and view repeatedly.
But going to the next step, feature-length movies, will take new hardware. This does not necessarily mean a video iPod. It will require hardware of some kind, though, to painlessly get these movies onto TV screens.
There are several approaches to solving the digital home theatre problem, which echo the thin client vs. desktop PC argument of a few years ago:
- Home Theatre PCs - full, desktop-class computers running personal video recorder and audio/video jukebox software
- "Thin clients" - network devices that act as video output peripherals (i.e. Airport Express for Video)
- A video iPod (vPod) that downloads video from iTunes and can also output it to a TV as most digital cameras can today
If you're not familiar with Airport Express, it's a convenient, portable $129 WiFi gadget that lets you set up a WiFi access point anywhere and also acts as a remote audio output for iTunes. If you're running iTunes, you can effortlessly pipe your audio output to any Airport Express, and thus out of your stereo system or TV speakers, anywhere in your home.
It's often said that iTunes is essentially a loss leader to promote iPod sales. I've also been told that Steve Jobs doesn't believe in home-theatre PCs. The Airport Express allows the Mac to remain the "digital hub" for your home entertainment. So it would be consistent with this vision (and Mac rumor sites are conjecturing) that Apple will come up with some sort of WiFi video output device (perhaps based on its implementation of MPEG-4/H.264/AVC video) that can connect to the television and serve as a "video out" for iTunes and QuickTime.
It's interesting to note that such a device almost exists already: Apple's $500 Mac Mini has DVI video output, and many people have found that they can hook one up to their HDTV and watch their QuickTime videos on the big screen. I'll be at the Apple Worldwide Developers Conference in a couple of weeks, and many of us are hoping that Apple announces at least one of the video solutions listed above. Stay tuned.
---
P.S. In the meantime, video iTunes has at least solved one problem that has plagued Mac users for a decade. It has a "full screen" feature for movies. That means you no longer have to pay $29 for QuickTime pro in order to play your movies fullscreen.
By - May 31, 2005 | Permalink
| Category: Digital Video
| SVW Toolbar | SVW Newsletter | SVW Mobile
- NEW STORIES:
- Who is Making the Most Money from Web 2.0?
- Foremski's Take: GOOG Browser Designed to Please Wall Street
- Finland Funnels $1.3m into Innovation Journalism Research
- Judy Estrin on the Gender Gap in Silicon Valley
- Weekend Watcher: Sol Crawford's Pioneering Hornucopia Music Festival
- Fishwrap: PR bloggers urge vote early and vote often . . . The Mad Professor plus SeeqPod . . . TubeMogul for Micro Media Moguls
- Thought Leader Interview: Judy Estrin on the Innovation Gap in Silicon Valley and Beyond . . .
- Fridays with Foremski Coming in September...
- We Have a Serious Innovation Deficit Says Silicon Valley Thought Leader Judy Estrin
- A Peek Into My Day at Intel Developer Forum
Comments
Gunter Pfaff on Thought Leader Interview: Judy Estrin on the Innovation Gap in Silicon Valley and Beyond . . .
Hi - The article about innovation reminded me of the lack of it when we explored the production of tempeh (and we ended up with the only two patents since tempeh was made in the late 60's)
The problem we have faced since then with the media is with the control that big industry exerts and we have trouble getting exposure. When we contact soy related media and they discover we use "organic" beans, they find excuses not to publish since most of their support comes from the ag.chemical com
Don Baker on More Love Not Hate ... Launch a SPAM Grenade!
I think this is a bad idea
Tom Foremski on Foremski's Take: GOOG Browser Designed to Please Wall Street
Yes, merging the address bar and navigation are a point of concern. It is not just link farms based on mispellings that should be worried but all brand owners...
NoDomainsForSale on Foremski's Take: GOOG Browser Designed to Please Wall Street
The merging of the address bar and search bar gives Google too much control over navigation. It separates companies and website operators from their website addresses and brands.
Companies spend heavily to establish and maintain brands. Google has just imposed itself between consumers and businesses. Direct navigation has now become proprietary search, whereby Google uses its discretion to filter out web addresses and domains that it deems less relevant.
I object and I
David Ward on Who is Making the Most Money from Web 2.0?
The difference in TechCrunch50 and Demo is that Demo charges $18,500 for the company to present. TechCrunch50 does not charge the company, only the attendees.
Alan on Foremski's Take: GOOG Browser Designed to Please Wall Street
That's the most sensible blog post I have read so far on the subject.
Knut Holt on UPDATE:GOOG wants your website to do better
I might try it on one of my web-sites, even though I do not use Google adsense right now.
Busby on 7 Reasons Startups Should Not Take VC Funding - Advice from a Serial Entrepreneur
Good post if you get money early you will have to get most of the business to the VC's and will have to do what they say. Its better to build slowly and own more of your business after you are noticed the VC's may come to you this is when you'll get the best deal.
Dan on Searching for search on the iPhone - where is it?
I agree with the above limitations and may have another one...when I type a word and make a spelling mistake (big fingers) I can't seem to place the cursor in the middle of the word and correct the mistake. I have to place the cursor at the end of the word and delete back to the mistake and type again. This seems to be a huge waste of time and is functionality that should be included in a 'touch screen' iPhone Thoughts? Am I missing something?
Tom Foremski on Fridays with Foremski Coming in September...
Thanks Anna :-)
Anna Atwell on Fridays with Foremski Coming in September...
Tom-
Another reason to look forward to Fridays!
Sally Falkow on PRWatch: PR Firms That Don't Blog Yet Offer New/Social Media Practices
Hi Tom
I agree that a PR agency needs to know the tools before they can use them for clients.
I started blogging back in 2003 and I'm still going. I do well with teaching others to blog.
In frustration I developed a small newsroom with rss feeds in 2004 because I could not find one at that time that did exaclty what I wanted. Now PRESSfeed is used by companies and other agencies.
I have been interested in podcasting but had not done it much myself, so conse
Gerd Leonhard on Public Relations is Such a Sensitive Profession . . .
Tom, good post. You may enjoy my slideshow on the Future of PR, here: http://www.mediafuturist.com/2008/03/presentation-on.html - would love to have your feedback, too.
Andrew Finlayson on Innovation Journalism At Stanford - And Japan's Interest in Silicon Valley As Media Valley
Hope you had a good trip to Japan. I wonder if you have seen the website www.livenewscameras.com
Do you know of any Japanese networks that are streaming live news coverage?
Tom Foremski on We Have a Serious Innovation Deficit Says Silicon Valley Thought Leader Judy Estrin
Don, are you talking about innovation across sectors are just in the telco/Ribbit niche?
Don Thorson on We Have a Serious Innovation Deficit Says Silicon Valley Thought Leader Judy Estrin
Ms Estrin is not seeing what I'm seeing. I'm seeing an innovation rebirth happening on a scale as big as any ever seen in Silicon Valley. It's true it may not look the same as the others - may not be as visible on the surface or share the same characteristics or metrics as the others - but in terms of rapid and significant global impact, this wave will out do them all. No question.
Innovation is still accelerating and I think we are again at an inflection point. Hold on, the brakes a
Ryan G on Craigslist is being blocked by Cox Interactive - is this a net neutrality issue?
Pardon the pun, but I don't think that Cox would have the balls.
Luca Penati on Public Relations is Such a Sensitive Profession . . .
PR is not synonymous with “publicist”
http://www.techprnibbles.com/pr-is-not-synonymous-with-publicist/
tom Foremski on "Social" Product Pitches Ring False . . .
JL: Yes, that is exactly why I didn't want to use "Social media release" because it was clear that "Social Media" like "Green" was part of a current fad/fashion and thus worth staying away from. That's why I wanted "New media release" or just "media release" because these are neutral terms - they don't snag on our social fabric.
Although I found no supporters for my position I was very calm and centered because I knew I would be vindicated ;-)
And it turns out sooner than late
JL on "Social" Product Pitches Ring False . . .
Blame the marketers. Since when did "social" and "business" mix? This sounds similar to all the things that are labeled "green" this and "green" that...