<rss version="0.91"><channel>
<title>Was the Tibco post a puff piece for an advertiser?</title>
<link>http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2005/02/was_the_tibco_p.php</link>
<description>By Richard Koman for SiliconValleyWatcher.com On his blog today, Dan Gillmor suggests that the post about our first sponsor is "advertising, and should be explicitly labeled that way." He compares the situation to a newspaper running a front-page story announcing that a new company is now advertising with the paper. We can all agree this would be unseemly pandering and on the face of it...</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<item>
<title>A storm in a tea cup?</title>
<link>http://www.natterjackpr.com/2005/02/25.html#a1358</link>
<description>Richard Koman over at Silicon Valley Watcher is a little upset at my comments earlier in the week regarding the post announcing Tibco as their blog&apos;s first sponsor.</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>